A police weapons specialist who shot himself in the hand is suing the PSNI...Why? So he wouldn't have been the "Only One" shot?
His legal team is arguing that a...second person should have been present...
What's the difference between "gun expert" Peter Woods and a shameless parasite looking for a payday to cover his incompetence?
Dang. I hate it when I forget the punch line.
[Via Sharp as a Marble]
7 comments:
Punch line: Left hand sues the right hand.
Or, Moron finds handy lawyer to sue for self inflicted injury.
Or better yet: Bottom feeding parasite sues for handout.
Feel free to use any one of these.
Had a competitor at our club once argue with the safety officer. This guy always cleared his chamber after a stage by putting his palm over the muzzle and racking the slide. Glocks exclusively.
"It's MY hand!"
"Not on my range, it's not. Then it's MY hand."
He left the match rather than be safe.
Maybe he's a police weapons specialist by now.
Protect me from being an over-trained elite. Those people are dangerous.
Punchline: One of them is a bloodsucking bottom-feeder and the other one is an insect.
If one injuries themselves, how is anyone else responsible, and labile for your own stupid actions?
"What's the difference between "gun expert" Peter Woods and a shameless parasite looking for a payday to cover his incompetence?"
Lipstick?
Looks like bruce krafft beats my puns on the topic and he didn't even use the word, pig.
Would that he had been pointing it at his own face.........
Post a Comment