Friday, November 21, 2008

e-Cacaphony

I wonder if these folks will be the next target?

Just sayin'...

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Don't even get me started.
btw/ Don't these people have their own match making arrangements at public expense? I believe they do, its called the public restrooms at parks.

BobG said...

That sets a very bad precedent, regardless of your sexual bias.

Anonymous said...

"These folks..."

Not gonna happen, David. Muslims have a habit of KILLING their enemies.

Lotta gays this morning on talkradio are also deploring this decision. Most simply want to be left alone to live their lifestyle, and only a few are the militats who want to inflict it on the rest of us.

Wordverification for this entry: micke (y?)

Kent McManigal said...

I'm hetero and I was rejected by eHarmony. It's a private business and can choose to operate as it sees fit. That doesn't mean they are "right or wrong", just that they have their opinions.

David Codrea said...

Dang--I just thought of something:
gHarmony--to match up gun owners...:)

Anonymous said...

Tis true. Nothing like a trip to the range with a date to work up an appetite for dinner!

Anonymous said...

"gHarmony--to match up gun owners..."

I don't think it'll work too well, guns don't use the computer.*

OH! Match gun owners to each other. That's an idea!


*They don't use the computer because they're all busy committing crimes, apparently.

Anonymous said...

As for the militant gays going after the muslims, I don't think we'll see that. However, the muslims may take a page from the book and demand that their dating services provide addresses of small boys and attractive goats.

Adam said...

Do you think we could use this to our advantage? I was not aware that class action status eliminated the requirement to have sustained harm to gain standing. A class action lawsuit against state or federal entities for laws infringing on 2A rights could surely attract lawyers smelling a potentially enormous settlement more so than a single person filing a suit. On a separate note, how can they sue when sexual orientation is not a protected class those protected classes being race, color, religion, sex, or national origin according the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Sex means male or female not hetero, homo or other. Sexual orientation is no more protected than being a 'gun nut'.