...had an article posted at the title-linked url with photos of houses with republican campaign signs, along with the addresses--obviously a blatant encouragement of voter intimidation. They have since taken down the post.
What a surprise--there's a red star in their logo.
If anybody has some time, see what you can find out about the proprietors--starting with where they live.
[Via Avg Joe]
UPDATE: It's in their print edition, though, titled "Hell Houses."
UPDATE: Oh, look, the reason they pulled it is because evil right wing bloggers started posting their addresses, and they're the victims here.
Sunday, November 02, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
See the difference between "authorized journalists" and those anarchistic "bloggers"!
"We regret that people are crazy."
Nice. Real nice. They screw up. and endanger people, but it's US who are crazy.
Even when they "apologize", they're most insulting bastards.
"We regret that people are crazy."
http://www.incharacter.org/article.php?article=119
false apology syndrome.
The Stranger is an "alternative lifestyle" rag. They thrive on this crap, and have for years. The editor is pretty well known in Seattle. Start searching here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Savage
they had something on their "slog"
http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/hell_houses_the_freakout
but as you can imagine, reasoned discourse came into play and comments are closed.
Every big shot with that Marxist propaganda outlet had they name and address printed a few times by some poster/s.
Here's a fact: The people's homes that have signs supporting republicans to have pictures of their homes and addresses displayed. Was done with the intent of harassment and seemingly without question hoping that someone would act in an unlawful way and destroy the signs or every???
These people had their "civil rights" come under unlawful attack by this media outlet. The federal government should file charges against the people running this media outlet. This is not serving anyone to do such actions by this media outlet and they have no First Amendment rights in such actions of intimation.
Post a Comment