The Greenfield City Council is proposing an ordinance that would ban city employees from bringing guns to work. [More]Rules and signs. What could go wrong?
I love the headline: "Greenfield tries..."
What did Master Yoda say about "There is no try..."?
Why free men should allow the hysterics of Fargo extras like Theodore Turnham, and Steve and Leonard Jankowski to lay claim on their rights is beyond me... And "Authorized Journalist" Chris O'Connell manages to get just that right concerned crusader inflection for our welfare into his act, doesn't he?
What any of them are prepared to do should someone with evil in his heart ignore their stupid little sign is beyond them--but any climate where you have to bundle up like that is the wrong place to be wetting yourself.
4 comments:
Why would the city councilman whose firearm inspired this panty-wetting carry an unloaded handgun, anyway?
Does he also carry a cellular phone with no batteries?
The move comes after council member-elect Howard Veldhuizen brought an unloaded gun to a city council meeting.
Some residents believes it sends the wrong message and said they do not feel safe going to city council meetings anymore.
"Some Residents" are insufferable weenies, and their contemptible fears should not be permitted to affect the actions of grown-ups.
I do wonder, though, same as 45S: Why was the guy's handgun unloaded? Seems kinda silly.
Oh...yeah. He was a city councilman. Silly conduct is hardly worth addressing.
any climate where you have to bundle up like that is the wrong place to be wetting yourself.
LOL!
Carry a brick instead. It requires no ammunition and little training in its use. It is the preferred weapon of disarmed populaces.
Post a Comment