Monday, February 02, 2009

We're the Only Ones Essentially Defenselesss Enough

They were victims of a new kind of telephone fraud that exploits a weakness in the way the 911 system handles calls from Internet-based phone services. The attacks — called "swatting" because armed police SWAT teams usually respond — are virtually unstoppable, and an Associated Press investigation found that budget-strapped 911 centers are essentially defenseless without an overhaul of their computer systems. [More]
The "Only One" centers are defenseless? What about the poor citizens they wrongly raid?
He was even arrested as the result of one call, because authorities found weapons he wasn't supposed to have while they were searching the house.
I wonder if a solution would be found if...no, I don't want to go there...do I?

[Via HZ]

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Funny how the 4th Ammendment doesn't apply anymore. Any evidence found in these ILLEGAL calls should be completely tossed out of any court. They better not have charged him with any weapons violations since the search warrant was authorized in fraud.

Kevin Wilmeth said...

"Nobody ever thought anyone would get hurt or die from a SWAT call," [defendant Trowbridge] said.

Aw, bless his hawrt, he thinks those nice men in the ninja costumes and face masks, jacked up on Only One adrenaline and waving machine pistols all over the place, are just playing a game.

He must be new around here...

Anonymous said...

I suppose with the Herring opinion from SCOTUS, there's little or no incentive for 911 centers to upgrade their systems.

That makes them complicit for each malicious "swatting" incident.

Anonymous said...

Anyone know the address of some politicians?

jon said...

oh holy crap. do i ever want to go there. i won't, though. someone will, but i won't.

Anonymous said...

This is bad from two perspectives:

1) it harasses law-abiding citizens
2) ties up SWAT teams from other calls where they really are needed.

And yes, what would happen if this were the home of a politician, or heaven forbid, an Only One?

Anonymous said...

The one victim had the goons hit his home three times. This tells you how bright the parasites are.
The government better deal with this in such a way that these idiots understand. In fact these people need to be subject to a raid themselves. And if they move wrong during that raid.........

me said...

I just had a thought.

Remember how raids of the wrong house can still result in prosecution if they find anything bad, even if they totally screw up. who's to say THEY aren't using this shit themselves to get around any of the "technical issues" of the law.

This IS a very dangerous thing if in the wrong hands, just like anything else that can possibly be used to harm someone. When you put any of those things in the the hands of government they become even more dangerous.

As for the anon thug supporters, all the government DOES is harass law-abiding citizens. Are SWAT tams "really needed" to terrorize elderly women on bogus tips? Perhaps Ryan Frederick was really in need of a SWAT raid?

As for anyone wringing their hands over this, best think before you push for the .gov to go "fixing" it. Everything's essentially running through the snoopin' through your poop servers now and you want them to "fix" this how?

How about they DON'T just send Al-polica out to every single call to shoot dogs and anything else they feel like.