The short answer from the antis would be--well, it hardly matters since masking their long-term intent has always been their MO. The short answer from the "incrementalists" will be along the lines of "because it doesn't stand a chance of passing."Today's Gun Rights Examiner column resurrects a discussion we've had before here at WarOnGuns, and poses a question to the major "gun/anti-gun lobby" proponents.
But we'll never know that unless it's on the discussion table, will we? [More]
Tell a friend?
Have you read the latest from all the Gun Rights Examiners?
- Atlanta: Ed Stone
- Austin: Howard Nemerov
- Boston: Ron Bokleman
- Charlotte: Paul Valone
- Chicago: Don Gwinn
- Cleveland: Daniel White
- DC: Mike Stollenwerk
- Denver: Dan Bidstrup
- Los Angeles: John Longenecker
- Minneapolis: John Pierce
- National: David Codrea
- Seattle: Dave Workman
- St. Louis: Kurt Hofmann
- Wisconsin: Gene German
No comments:
Post a Comment