...is pretty much what we would expect from ruling traitors... [More]
If they're against what the Framers considered as being necessary to the security of a free State, that's what they are, you know...
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Looks like Wayne did a pretty damn good job of explaining to that bottom feeder. It didn't do him any good though, the legal system is broke. We will have to resort to other avenues for defense against the "goons".
Forget the militia argument. What did Mr. Fincher do that was criminal? When did the government prove he had evil intentions? This country is Long Gone. What can we do.
This the same federal government that is "shocked and disappointed" at the state of the Afghanistan military in regards to assisting OUR TROOPS in protecting THEIR country? Perpetual war, perpetual lies. Afghan opium exports are up 200% in the last few years.
Oh, and the media that anounced that, and were themselves shocked and amazed at Afghan unreadiness, ignorance and incompetence... they felt the need to talk in the same breath about the Christmas Day airline bomb attempt, better documentation for AMERICAN travelers, AND the need to also remember the "white supremacist right-wing domestic terrorist threat." About a year ago, some guys, probably with their FBI infiltrator/agent provocateur, supposedly ALMOST had a "dirty bomb" of spent nuclear fuel.
All this certainly took my mind for a few seconds off the fact tht I have no job or prospect of one. That's the idea.
A just government has nothing to fear from armed, or armed and ORGANIZED, citizens.
If you feel you need your state's permission to organize and arm up, you've already lost. You've ceded your power by accepting their definition of "free" and "right" and "good" and "legal." Tyrants always have different definitions for themselves and for us.
Post a Comment