Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Is NYPD Discriminating Against Disabled Cop?

And, yeah, I know--ADA is another unconstitutional usurpation by the national government--but this is a case of any chair in a bar fight, and the immediate short term goal is to clobber the other guy.

Besides, setting different coercive entities against each other would be fun to watch, kind of like a dinosaur fight, and it could further confound the designs of a certain pathological control freak who thinks his function is to rule. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column recommends using their own rules to start a fight between competing oppressors.

Also get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

2 comments:

Mack said...

Well, actually the ADA was enacted pursuant to section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

SCOTUS has said Title II of the ADA is constitutional.

Clearly, discrimination against the disabled continues; the ADA continues to be needed.

David Codrea said...

A lot of unconstitutional stuff has been enacted and upheld.

Saying section 5 authorizes ADA is like saying the Commerce clause authorizes Pelosicare.