But all this leads to the singular question of why NRA will not oppose Kagan's nomination, instead offering words to give themselves cover, but no action to give those words meaning. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner column looks at more of that Vulcan chess-mastery we're told is for our own good.
Share the link?
5 comments:
The NRA, the world's largest gun confiscation lobby, is very likely supporting the nomination of Kagan. The results of McDonald has them petrified with fear.
LaPierre and his One Million dollar-a-year+ salary depends on people like Kagan on the court.
Time for the board to fire LaPierre and his gang.
Unless of course the board members all have lucrative business relationships with the thieves in the exec suite.
From Snowflakes in Hell:
"NRA Members of New York,
There are a myriad of rumors regarding the NRA cluttering the internet but one in particular is causing me personal anguish. That rumor reports that the NRA staff has issued a gag order to the NRA Board of Directors regarding comments on the nomination of Elena Kagen to the Supreme Court. Let me explain something about the structure of the NRA; authority to do anything within the NRA comes from you the members of the NRA. That authority is delegated to your elected Board of Directors who in turn elects officers and formulate policy that is then issued to the Executive Vice President/CEO who then turns that policy into action through the professional staff. Gag orders for the Board of Directors do not exist.
Friends; those of you close to me should know by now that telling me I can’t speak up on an issue of vital importance to the 2nd Amendment is going to get you into a war. I spoke vociferously regarding the nomination of Sonya Sotomayor to the Supreme Court; in fact I joined a number of national 2nd Amendment leaders protesting the appointment and urging through a nationally published letter she not be confirmed. I did that because of her ties to New York State and the position she took, on then recent, anti 2nd Amendment decisions. I have not taken a position on Elena Kagen’s nomination to the Supreme Court because I find it absurd that anyone with no judicial experience would be nominated to the Supreme Court and fervently hope the Republican Senators will block this nomination.
The 2nd Amendment protects all the rest. Why would the NRA, the protector of the 2nd Amendment, attempt to limit the 1st Amendment rights of its’ own Board of Directors? It does not but if you think the Board members you voted for could be gagged then you voted for the wrong guys.
Tom King
NRA Board of Directors
President
NYS Rifle & Pistol Association"
Dann in Ohio
This article bring to mind the whole, sorry "The Winning Team" debacle.
I'll take Neal Knox any day.
Yeah, saw these talking points--there is a BOD policy that ILA is the only authorized outlet for official NRA statements on this. My guess is that reminder was sent out specifically for this. I still don't see this as invalidating what Erickson posted--he says he has sources who confirm it and I don't see that disproven here--and importantly, NRA could close down all criticism by making a Kagan vote a scoring issue--right after they explain to us what impact the Sotomayor score will have. And for King to say he has not taken a position on Kagan because he finds it absurd is...absurd.
Post a Comment