I see no good reason for NRA not making its objections known before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The "political capital" apologia does not wash--if there was ever a time to take a firm stand, it is now. If only certain authorized individuals can speak on behalf of the Association, why isn't Cox appearing? NRA presents itself as the leader, but the battle has begun and they're absent from the field, telling us their role is to be observers, not combatants. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner column looks at a denial of words against a denial of actions.
Share the link?
1 comment:
In the 30 years I've been involved in the freedom movement, the NRA has always done what's best for the NRA. Maneuvering, compromise WHEN NO COMPROMISE WAS NECESSARY OR ASKED FOR... in order to not appear "extreme." Yet that is what these Quislings are called, nevertheless. They threw us unorganized and organized militia members under the bus in the '90s. "No NRA member would belong," they said. "Any law-abiding citizen would turn in his ___ in accordance with a new law," they said. But your membership fee? "From our cold dead hands!"
Post a Comment