Compulsory involvement in vaccine studies is one alternative solution that is not as outlandish as it might seem on first consideration. Many societies already mandate that citizens undertake activities for the good of society...Try it, Mengele heirs Susanne Sheehy and Joel Meyer. Just understand some will take it personally, and remember your hand in this.
AMA "ethics." No wonder these hive insects are anti-gun.
[Via Jeet]
6 comments:
From the article:
The fundamental principles of medical ethics—beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice—are, as always, conflicted on this issue.
Gee, funny. The only conflict I can think of that a free man would have is: .308 or .30-06.
I read somewhere (don't remember where) that doctors kill more people than do people with guns.
[W3]
Now W W Woodward, that's only if you don't count the Only Ones among the killers with guns...
Please do not think the authors of this article speak for all physicians.
As the article is published in a "forum" to provoke discussion, it does not even represent the position of the AMA. (Although their accepting it for publication unfortunately demonstrates that they do find it worthy of consideration).
Hardly the first time my fundamental beliefs have been at odds with our national organization.
No worries, Eric F., and I know some wonderful pro-RKBA physicians and attorneys. The AMA leadership, much like the ABA's, is notoriously anti-gun, as we've documented from time to time over the years.
I'm sure the doctors who advocate forcing others to test vaccines will step up to the plate to be first in line.
Post a Comment