Several residents called police, noting the suspects are black and inquiring whether Mahaney was specifically targeted because he is white. He was not, the chief said. [More]Hell of an investigation there, chief, to be able to say that so soon and with such certainty. I'm surprised the "Authorized Journalists" included that bit of information, even if buried--it's usually something they intentionally suppress altogether--as regressive mouthpieces ridicule those who point the deliberate avoidance out, and then make ridiculous, illogical and simply untrue denials like:
White-on-black crime comes from a position of power. The opposite -- the minority oppressing the majority -- is impossible...Yes, there's a double-standard. And until there's full equality and the long slow process of racial healing is completed, the double-standard has to remain.
Jesse and Al are counting on that.
4 comments:
This is just SO screwed up! Aggression is a crime, irregardless of the race/sex/age of the participants or their intentions. And I've never heard of any crime of aggression motivated by actual love, so this "hate" crime nonsense is stupid.
These roving packs of predators will continue (and increase) to "love" their victims until they no longer can find helpless, unarmed people to prey on.
But just imagine they hoplophobic hysteria if he HAD been armed and had defended himself. Catch 22 for sure.
Dead 13-year and 15-year old kids who were just trying to beat a man into unconciousness or death?
If you thought the mess George Zimmerman found himself in was big, wait until the above happens.
Won't matter if it's completely justified under laws with roots dating back hundreds of years - "WHITE MAN MURDERS BLACK BABIES" will be the headlines for months! Justice? Wayne Fincher. David Olofson. Ed and Elaine Brown. George Zimmerman. Fancy your odds?
-PG
For me, the double standard died with the Trayvon Martin debacle.
From now on, I treat black thugs harshly, VERY harshly, just like I do all thugs.
They want equal treatment, by God, they're going to get it.
Probably a statement of wishful thinking, not a statement of fact. Instead of "He was not [targeted because of his race], the chief said", it probably actually is "I hope he was not [targeted because of his race], the chief said, because if he was, there will be hell to pay, and you and I do not want be around when it happens".
Do you think any of the six would admit it if the chief directly asked them if the beaten man was targeted because of his race? If no one verbalized it but one suggested the action to the other five, would it be a case of six thinking it but no one saying it out loud?
Trayvon Martin's family's attorney would suggest that the white man who was beaten walked by the six black teenagers to provoke them, as he did not have to do that.
Nothing to see here. Move along, now.
Post a Comment