Several of you have sent me this link over the past few days and I haven't done anything with it. [More]
While such a ruling is nuts, I'm trying to get some further information on this and want to be circumspect for now.
Rather than focus on his being armed on duty, which is absolutely an "Only Ones" illustration, we ought to be concerned for why he is barred from guns off duty, because such rationales could apply to all of us.
It's why, when some of our ostensible gun rights "leaders" champion facilitating mental health prohibitions, they ought to be pressured into fleshing out all the details. Let's start with a list of psychiatrists who are willing to put their name, license and malpractice insurability on the line to certify someone once forbidden is now OK to have whatever guns and however much ammo he wants.
Because without that, it's all words.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment