“The Court ordered the return of Razzano’s long arms [but] after years of litigation ... Razzano is still ‘ineligible’ for a Nassau County pistol license, and thus under the SAFE Act is subject to having all of his ‘weapons’ confiscated, including hunting rifles and shotguns for self-defense in his home,” the current Razzano lawsuit explains. [More]Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes an overlooked case that deserves attention for no other reason than one of basic justice.
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Lesser-known SAFE Act lawsuit raises unique points and risks for gun rights
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment