"After careful consideration of the iP1’s design, we have determined that it does not satisfy the statutory definition (of a smart gun) because, as a matter of design, the pistol may be fired by a person who is not an authorized or recognized user. That is, as long as the pistol is situated within 10 inches of the enabling wristwatch, it may be fired by anyone - the authorized user or any other person who is able to pull the trigger." [More]The antis will never be satisfied anyway, but good. Let's hope they're sputtering in impotent rage.
Funny -- they seem awful quiet about it at this writing. Nothing on their website, their blog or Facebook page yet, either.
I'm sure we'll see something soon, won't we? Perhaps they want to put more thought and patience into their excuse-making than they did in their lawsuit...?
No comments:
Post a Comment