Thursday, February 09, 2017

Another 'So-Called Judge'

Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins, a Democrat, says the resolution is non-binding and is meant to make those here illegally feel comfortable ... [More]
When lawmakers and judges promote lawlessness, that is exactly what you get.

A question to consider: If the law is supposed to protect us from them, does it not also serve to protect them from us?

It's a shame Judge Gorsuch thinks he needs to run away from plain speaking on judging such subversives. And I'm giving him the benefit of a yuge assumption here.

UPDATE: And it turns out that was "fake news"?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Somebody who watched the live C-Span coverage of Elizabeth Warren's insult of Sessions the other day pointed out that most of the MSM was selectively editing the feed to imply that she was being called out by McConnell for reading King's letter. They made it about race-baiting, instead of the real issue: Warren's Rule XIX violation by quoting Ted Kennedy that Sessions " . . . is a disgrace".
-MM

Anonymous said...

Additionally, while the topic was about "fake news", Judge Gorsuch may find " . . . any criticism of a judge's integrity and independence disheartening and demoralizing.", I find the FACT that most judges LACK integrity and independence, not to mention a comprehension of the law they're supposedly interpreting, to be disheartening and demoralizing. The very idea that appeals courts and the U.S. Supreme Court itself must repeatedly remand cases - WITH INSTRUCTIONS - back to lower courts, many times referring to several cases that have already decided the issues, shows that those lower courts don't understand plain English, much less the legal concepts involved. I won't even address the fact that attorneys, much less LEO's, understand even less about the "law". Plain folk are at the mercy of ignoramuses with power. Like a chimp with a machine gun.
-MM