Saturday, June 03, 2017

Juncker Warning on Climate Treaty Recalls Meddling on U.S. Guns and Sovereignty


After all, we’ve already seen what he and his fellow Eurocrats think about the right of the people to keep and bear arms (they have it over there– it's just not recognized as such by their rulers). [More]
Just ask yourself which you would rather have: U.S. sovereignty or the approval of some drunken Luxembourgian with delusions of global governance?

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The reaction to US pulling away from the Paris Accord is really the globalists/communists/liberals showing their true feelings. There isn't a shred of critical thinking involved.

Nowhere near the same reaction after the people get slaughtered by another terror attack, in terms of emotional response. The response is always 'more government'.

Why aren't those Eruabia globalists just saying publicly "the US is one country, we can still do plenty to combat freedom-er, climate change with the US involved..."? Follow the money

Jerry The Geek said...

Heard on Rush Limbaugh the other day that the "'Treaty on Treaties' Treaty" *never heard of THAT before!* implies that if the president says he "agrees in principle" to a treaty, that is an implied acceptance of a treaty and bypasses Congress.

Anybody know if that's truly true?

Roger J said...

Last time I checked it was the US that has military assets in Germany (and many other EU countries), not the other way around. Guess I won't worry about Herr Juncker's threat until the Baltic republics stage their intimidating fly-by over Washington to make us go back to the Paris accord. That one Lithuanian AF plane is going to look pretty lonely up there. The one truly great AF they had was the RAF, which the EU is losing (though the Brits will still be part of NATO.) Why are we still suckered into defending this bunch of Continental losers?