Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Important Reminder for SF Gun Owners
If you're a gun owner who lives in San Francisco, attorney Gary W. Gorski wants to hear from you.
French Killing African-Americans!
Hard to say because it's been 11 days since two African- American teenagers were killed, electrocuted during a police chase, which prompted all of this.Quick--somebody tell Minister Farrakhan and Rev. Sharpton!
Remember--only CNN's Carol Lin and her Establishment Lapdog colleagues are professional enough to be trusted with officially-recognized journalist status.
[Via SayUncle citing Ravenwood crediting WSJ]
Are You Connected?
By virtue of the fact that you're reading this, you obviously are. But it's surprising (and disappointing) how many gun owners spend no time on the internet, and rely on establishment media for their news and information--assuming they're paying any attention at all.
"Are You Connected" is my Rights Watch column for the November issue of GUNS Magazine. Print out a copy and give it to a gun-owning friend who isn't.
"Are You Connected" is my Rights Watch column for the November issue of GUNS Magazine. Print out a copy and give it to a gun-owning friend who isn't.
First Do No Harm
If you had a funny noise in your engine, who would you go to? A pediatrician, right?
Same with a ghosting problem on your new plasma TV--you'd consult your child's doctor, wouldn't you?
No?
Why not?
Because education and perceived stature as an authority figure notwithstanding, when you get them out of their area of expertise, they're just as fallible as the rest of us, aren't they?
But somehow, they assume--and want the public to believe--they are qualified to prescribe a cure for gun accidents in the home--even though their specialized training in gun safety may be non-existent. And worse, we've seen this junk science codified into law--with penalties for disobedience--and tragic, outrageous results like pitchfork murders.
That's why it's unacceptable to see the medical community continue to pose as authorities in a field where its qualifications have not been established. And it's dissapointing to see Forbes parrot this nonsense without asking the basic questions: What would happen if you needed a gun and it was locked up and separated from its ammunition? What would happen if a fire broke out, and your extinguisher was similarly disabled?
Several years back, I teamed up with professional risk manager and former LA Deputy Sheriff Joe Horn to create the Physician Qualifications and Liability Form to challenge doctors' credentials for offering medical advice in an area where they have not been trained.
The form established three things: that the physician has or has not received certification and training in home firearms safety counseling; that the physician's medical malpractice insurance does or does not cover engaging in activities for which the physician is not certified; and that the physician accepts legal financial liability should their advice result in injury or death.
It's past time we started pushing back on this. I'd like to see gun owners print out this form and have a copy handy whenever they go, or take their children, to the doctor, and to produce it if the doctor initiates gun safety couseling.
Most may mean well, but we all know what the road to Hell is paved with.
Same with a ghosting problem on your new plasma TV--you'd consult your child's doctor, wouldn't you?
No?
Why not?
Because education and perceived stature as an authority figure notwithstanding, when you get them out of their area of expertise, they're just as fallible as the rest of us, aren't they?
But somehow, they assume--and want the public to believe--they are qualified to prescribe a cure for gun accidents in the home--even though their specialized training in gun safety may be non-existent. And worse, we've seen this junk science codified into law--with penalties for disobedience--and tragic, outrageous results like pitchfork murders.
That's why it's unacceptable to see the medical community continue to pose as authorities in a field where its qualifications have not been established. And it's dissapointing to see Forbes parrot this nonsense without asking the basic questions: What would happen if you needed a gun and it was locked up and separated from its ammunition? What would happen if a fire broke out, and your extinguisher was similarly disabled?
Several years back, I teamed up with professional risk manager and former LA Deputy Sheriff Joe Horn to create the Physician Qualifications and Liability Form to challenge doctors' credentials for offering medical advice in an area where they have not been trained.
The form established three things: that the physician has or has not received certification and training in home firearms safety counseling; that the physician's medical malpractice insurance does or does not cover engaging in activities for which the physician is not certified; and that the physician accepts legal financial liability should their advice result in injury or death.
It's past time we started pushing back on this. I'd like to see gun owners print out this form and have a copy handy whenever they go, or take their children, to the doctor, and to produce it if the doctor initiates gun safety couseling.
Most may mean well, but we all know what the road to Hell is paved with.
"A Republic, If You Can Keep It"
We apparently can't. Most have betrayed the founding principles for the false promise of "democracy."
The majority of our countrymen have the government they deserve. And they're dragging the rest of us down with them.
In other election news, gun-grabbers won in New Jersey, Virginia and New York City.
The majority of our countrymen have the government they deserve. And they're dragging the rest of us down with them.
MEASURE H (SF Gun Ban)
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 89,696 - 57.91
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,185 - 42.09
In other election news, gun-grabbers won in New Jersey, Virginia and New York City.