Here's That "National Conversation on Guns" the Antis Said They Wanted

[More]

Click the link for details. And please help spread the word.

Race-tailored tactics used to disparage black gun rights advocates

Such accusations, routinely leveled at white gun owners, have been pretty much absent from that “national conversation on guns” the antis say they want to have. In their place are “progressives” hurling racist ridicule at gun rights advocates of color, but those attacks have mostly been for daring to depart from the official party loyalty line demanded by collectivist plantation overseers. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary notes the motive may have been repackaged, but it's still enslavement.

About That "National Conversation on Guns"

You don't think they actually wanted one, do you? [More]

[Via Michael G]

About that "National Conversation on Guns"

I'm still trying to think of an appropriate response to "Surrender or die" that doesn't start with an "F"... [More]

[Via John B]

Moms Demand Agreement

So much for that "national conversation on guns" they were saying we needed... [More]

[Via bondmen]

Bloomberg continues debate-avoiding stealth media events with prop ‘gun owners’

The announcement hardly leaves enough time for gun rights activists hearing about the demonstrations now to mount counter-presences to the events. That is intentional. [More]

This afternoon’s Gun Rights Examiner report asks "What if you held a national conversation on guns and didn’t tell the side that’s FOR them?" And why aren’t you hearing about this from the “real reporters”?

"Comments are Disabled for this Video"

Of course they are. [Watch]

It's all part of that "national conversation on guns" the antis say we need to have.

[Via Andrea Shea King]

Meanwhile, Over at That "National Conversation on Guns" the "Progressives" Say They Want to Have...

[More]

[Via  War Kitten Cracka]

Enemies of freedom activists ramp up cyber warfare and hate

Make no mistake: We are up against malevolent enemies, and the use of that word is not hyperbole. Like true totalitarians, they will try to smear us, to insult us and to shut us down. They will try to eradicate our thought from the public forum of ideas, protestations about having a “national conversation on guns” or any other issue notwithstanding. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner report notes there is no peace to be made with those whose goal is to destroy us.

Cop rape case highlights life-endangering outrage of ‘Only Ones’ mentality

But at what point would physical resistance to officer abuse under color of authority become appropriate, from both a moral and legal standpoint? At what point would a citizen be able to engage in self-defense against an attacker with a badge, up to and including using lethal force to stop a threat? [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary adds another dimension to that "national conversation on guns" the antis say they want to have.  Why not see if they're serious? Send them this link, then watch them shuffle, evade, change the subject, attack, ridicule and do everything but directly answer the following question: Under what circumstances would you find it morally justifiable to shoot a police officer?

Meanwhile, Over at that "National Conversation on Guns"...

From the CNN story on the Houston airport shooter, we have James Butler:

Just Imagine!

“…but the Founder’s couldn’t have imagined more than muskets.” [Read] 

Bob Owens exposes an unimaginative lie that's become a widespread talking point the antis keep trying to inject into that "national conversation on guns."

Imagine that!

You Know That "National Conversation on Guns" All the Antis Wanted to Have?

It was never really a conversation. It wasn't even a monologue. It was a dictation of the terms of surrender: Obey or die. [Read] 

Good job, Kurt, as always.

I'm exhausted, it's snowing, I've had a hell of a day, it's Friday night and I'm shutting down. Don't expect emails answered or comments moderated for the rest of the day. 

After Newtown shooting, it’s time to have that ‘national conversation on guns’

The bottom line is, he was evil, and evil is something that will devour those who do not resist it, repel it and send it howling back into the darkness. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary speaks of the unspeakable. It's within our power to take over the dialogue, and there's never been a better time than now.

Toning Down the Rhetoric

The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a Third World dictator and just throw these guys in jail. [Watch]

So if thugs are sent out to do that, is it OK if I use IEDs on them, or would CSGV call me a traitor?

We've also recently been treated to "There will be blood" and warned of "civil war."

If you disagree, that makes you a "hate speech promoter," and we all know what should happen to them.

Say, who wants to have "a national conversation about guns" with these domestic enemies, as opposed to, say, hearing the lamentation of their women if they end up actually starting something requiring physical resistance?

Conversation Piece

The Missing Conversation on Guns ... calls for a national conversation on America's culture of guns and violence ... a conversation that has not taken place ... "a national conversation" ... those conversations ... The calls for a conversation on America's gun culture ... [More] 

Oh, looky here.

And here.

And here.

And ... what was it you wanted to talk about again, Reid Wilson? Besides continually parroting this transparent gun-grabber talking point?

OK, here's the starting point for our "national conversation".

And There Was War in Heaven

“If you think about it, the president, as I remember, said he wants more conversation. Well, we’ve been saying this for quite a while now. We don’t need more talk. [More]

But...but...but...

And Dan Gross worked so hard on creating that "We need to have a national conversation on guns" slogan...

A Conversation We Need to Have

You  know, listening to useful idiot "peace" loons who know absolutely nothing about guns to establish policy and law... [Read]

Note the code phrases  about "common sense" and "conversation we need to have."  Note the goals:

*reinstating the federal assault weapons ban...
*closing the so-called “gun show loophole”...

That "national conversation" language is straight out of Brady, and part of a coordinated anti-gun subversive/media/political axis., intended to filter into the national consciousness by being repeated over and over and over by all three.

Check out the Democrat platform:

We believe in an honest, open national conversation about firearms. We can focus on effective enforcement of existing laws, especially strengthening our background check system, and we can work together to enact commonsense improvements—like reinstating the assault weapons ban and closing the gun show loophole...

Here's my contribution to the conversation we need to have:

No. Now stop bothering us and go away. Or make your move.