Meanwhile,Over at that "National Conversation on Guns" the Antis Say They Want to Have...

Comment left under an article about a washing machine argument gone homicidal  in #1 Brady State California, where "authorities had made dozens of previous trips to the home":

Captain's Log

• For the children*
• Strangers in a strange land
• Notes

* By the way, Herschel's link to the Moloch piece has a great example in comments of what that "national conversation on guns" -- the one "progressives" say they want -- looks like in practice:

gratuitous [makes his anti-gun point, trying to sound all reasonable and adult]Sho Rembo [makes his pro-gun counterpoint]gratuitous: F*!# off, @$$hole. Nobody asked you.

Suits Them to a T

Anti-gun male Harmon Leon is feeling Alinsky Rule 5 clever! Snark-Snark! [More]

Oh, Harmony, you're such a Gundupe:

That's a word I wouldn't mind seeing entered into that "national conversation on guns" the brainless hive insects keep buzzing about.

Plastic Fantastic Lover

It works with plastic, it is fantastic, and I love it. [More]

So naturally, the antis want anyone who feels that way to die, and are even eager to help kill us.

Really.

Go read Kurt's piece. He not only explains, he shows.

Kind'a makes me want to go have a "national conversation on guns" and maybe even offer up a "compromise" or two in the name of "common sense." Either that or tell them to f*** off and come show me what they're made of.

How 'bout you?

Told Ya Feeding Trolls Was Fun

Comments are picking up and they're really showing what they're all about. [More]

Who wants to have a "national conversation on guns" with these animals?

Here's That "National Conversation on Guns" the Antis Said They Wanted

[More]

Click the link for details. And please help spread the word.

Race-tailored tactics used to disparage black gun rights advocates

Such accusations, routinely leveled at white gun owners, have been pretty much absent from that “national conversation on guns” the antis say they want to have. In their place are “progressives” hurling racist ridicule at gun rights advocates of color, but those attacks have mostly been for daring to depart from the official party loyalty line demanded by collectivist plantation overseers. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary notes the motive may have been repackaged, but it's still enslavement.

About That "National Conversation on Guns"

You don't think they actually wanted one, do you? [More]

[Via Michael G]

About that "National Conversation on Guns"

I'm still trying to think of an appropriate response to "Surrender or die" that doesn't start with an "F"... [More]

[Via John B]

Moms Demand Agreement

So much for that "national conversation on guns" they were saying we needed... [More]

[Via bondmen]

Bloomberg continues debate-avoiding stealth media events with prop ‘gun owners’

The announcement hardly leaves enough time for gun rights activists hearing about the demonstrations now to mount counter-presences to the events. That is intentional. [More]

This afternoon’s Gun Rights Examiner report asks "What if you held a national conversation on guns and didn’t tell the side that’s FOR them?" And why aren’t you hearing about this from the “real reporters”?

"Comments are Disabled for this Video"

Of course they are. [Watch]

It's all part of that "national conversation on guns" the antis say we need to have.

[Via Andrea Shea King]

Meanwhile, Over at That "National Conversation on Guns" the "Progressives" Say They Want to Have...

[More]

[Via  War Kitten Cracka]

Enemies of freedom activists ramp up cyber warfare and hate

Make no mistake: We are up against malevolent enemies, and the use of that word is not hyperbole. Like true totalitarians, they will try to smear us, to insult us and to shut us down. They will try to eradicate our thought from the public forum of ideas, protestations about having a “national conversation on guns” or any other issue notwithstanding. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner report notes there is no peace to be made with those whose goal is to destroy us.

Cop rape case highlights life-endangering outrage of ‘Only Ones’ mentality

But at what point would physical resistance to officer abuse under color of authority become appropriate, from both a moral and legal standpoint? At what point would a citizen be able to engage in self-defense against an attacker with a badge, up to and including using lethal force to stop a threat? [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary adds another dimension to that "national conversation on guns" the antis say they want to have.  Why not see if they're serious? Send them this link, then watch them shuffle, evade, change the subject, attack, ridicule and do everything but directly answer the following question: Under what circumstances would you find it morally justifiable to shoot a police officer?

Just Imagine!

“…but the Founder’s couldn’t have imagined more than muskets.” [Read] 

Bob Owens exposes an unimaginative lie that's become a widespread talking point the antis keep trying to inject into that "national conversation on guns."

Imagine that!

After Newtown shooting, it’s time to have that ‘national conversation on guns’

The bottom line is, he was evil, and evil is something that will devour those who do not resist it, repel it and send it howling back into the darkness. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary speaks of the unspeakable. It's within our power to take over the dialogue, and there's never been a better time than now.

Toning Down the Rhetoric

The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a Third World dictator and just throw these guys in jail. [Watch]

So if thugs are sent out to do that, is it OK if I use IEDs on them, or would CSGV call me a traitor?

We've also recently been treated to "There will be blood" and warned of "civil war."

If you disagree, that makes you a "hate speech promoter," and we all know what should happen to them.

Say, who wants to have "a national conversation about guns" with these domestic enemies, as opposed to, say, hearing the lamentation of their women if they end up actually starting something requiring physical resistance?