End the War on Freedom points us to an open letter to Laissez Faire Books from Sunni Maravillosa.
Seems they don’t want to carry Vin Suprynowicz’s “The Black Arrow,” which is their right. But their reasons are laughable.
LFB’s Kathleen Hiserodt cites her primary motive:
“[W]e are concerned about offending our customers with what we see as the gratuitous vulgar sexual content. I couldn't see any good reason for including it, and I think it makes the book inappropriate for a significant segment of our market.”
In a follow-up, Ms. Hiserodt notes: “[T]he sexual content that I found offensive had absolutely nothing to do with freedom or pro-creation. It was completely centered around slavery, extortion, and degradation.”
Umm, wouldn’t that mean it wasn’t “gratuitous”?
I’m not that comfortable with graphic sexual descriptions, either, but when I saw what Vin was doing—reserving his most “vulgar” narratives for scenes involving coercion and submission to state authority figures—it made sense. And that means the uncomfortable emotions the sexual scenes evoked in me did their job, and proved Vin’s skill as a fiction writer.
I also can’t seem to find “Unintended Consequences” at LFB. Oh, that’s right, John Ross included some of that “gratuitous vulgar sexual content.”
Well, if they want to create a niche market for liberty activists and then leave out two of the most important liberty novels targeted at that niche, I guess it’s their business.
“Yes, LFB could carry it and issue explicit warnings about the content,” Hiserodt explains. “We seriously considered doing just that. On the other hand, we have many other books that we can endorse wholeheartedly. Why is this book so important or unique that it is worth spending extra space (taken away from other books we could offer or describe in greater detail) to warn people that this book might be something they don't really want?”
Yeah, I guess putting the words “WARNING-BOOK CONTAINS GRAPHIC SEXUAL SITUATIONS” or some such on their ads would really be an extreme effort. Why, their customers might actually have to make a free choice! As to why this “book [is] so important or unique,” let’s look through the rest of the LFB catalog. Besides this and the absent UC, which other novels do they carry that provide graphic descriptions of underground liberty fighters targeting corrupt American government officials?
“If I were given free reign to edit the book (I wasn't asked),” Hiserodt continues, “I do think there is a book in there that LFB would love to carry.”
Thank God she wasn’t asked. Vin doesn’t need someone who doesn’t even understand that the term is “free rein,” (as in a rider letting the horse choose the way—giving unrestricted liberty to—in other words, “laissez faire”) as opposed to “free reign” (apparently her freedom to rule), tampering with his masterpiece.
As a side note, Vin, if this somehow comes to your attention, please consider this from a fan: Dvorak’s Symphony in E Minor, “From the New World” (the Berlin Philharmonic version)—I know you have all kinds of rock ‘n roll in the book, but for the opening music, I can’t think of a better theme for The Black Arrow when it finally gets the recognition it deserves and is made into a movie.
One more comment: I note the BA site says it still has some of its signed leather bound inventory left. What the hell is wrong with people? Why didn’t this sell out two months ago? Go out and buy this book. Jesus—our side—talk, talk, talk.
Support?
With money?
[Insert excuse here]
And then we bitch about domination of the media.
Sunday, May 08, 2005
A Mothers' Day Wish...
...for all you mothers out there, guaranteed by the policies promoted by the Brady Campaign/Million Mom March.
A Reason Debate
I've rarely read such unmitigated horse manure--especially the suggestions from those ostensibly on "our" side.
Kates, in particular, continues to be a disappointment.
The eggheads can keep debating. When the debate descends from the ivory tower, it won't be their opinions that count.
Never give up. Never give in.
Kates, in particular, continues to be a disappointment.
The eggheads can keep debating. When the debate descends from the ivory tower, it won't be their opinions that count.
Never give up. Never give in.
Saturday, May 07, 2005
Fish Or Man Update
Guilty.
"In picking the jury the prosecutor removed the three that admitted to being pro-second amendment."
Update update:
"Jury Instruction No. 5"
"In picking the jury the prosecutor removed the three that admitted to being pro-second amendment."
Update update:
"Jury Instruction No. 5"
“Imaging a Safer World”
After clicking on the headline link, scroll down and select "[Demonstration]"
"May 6, 2005 08:20 - With 45 ft range, BIS-WDS™ Prime uses passive millimeter wave sensor technology to detect guns, knives, or bombs of metal, plastic, or composite construction. Weapons Detection System (WDS) consists of millimeter wave camera combined with video camera and algorithm software that interfaces to other security devices/networks. Capable of identifying up to 50 threats simultaneously, system produces electronic alarm when suspicious item is detected."
Well, we knew THIS was coming.
A Lockheed Martin joint venture, eh? “The single largest contractor to the United States Federal Government.” Figures.
In other words, profits on cost-plus contracts paid for by We the People are funneled into R&D for spinoff ventures that will be used to further captivate us.
Here are the capitalists who are selling the rope.
Naturally, former War on Drugs “czar” (notice they never say “fuhrer”?) Barry McCaffrey is part of the team. How could we build a Brave New World without him?
Time to work on creative ways to defeat this obscenity against privacy and liberty…
Any bets that Brijot’s legal counsel would scream the loudest about properly executed warrants should a raid for financial/time reporting/inventory records occur?
Any bets they'd cite the following in their complaint?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
[Thanks to KABA Newslinks for the tip.]
"May 6, 2005 08:20 - With 45 ft range, BIS-WDS™ Prime uses passive millimeter wave sensor technology to detect guns, knives, or bombs of metal, plastic, or composite construction. Weapons Detection System (WDS) consists of millimeter wave camera combined with video camera and algorithm software that interfaces to other security devices/networks. Capable of identifying up to 50 threats simultaneously, system produces electronic alarm when suspicious item is detected."
Well, we knew THIS was coming.
A Lockheed Martin joint venture, eh? “The single largest contractor to the United States Federal Government.” Figures.
In other words, profits on cost-plus contracts paid for by We the People are funneled into R&D for spinoff ventures that will be used to further captivate us.
Here are the capitalists who are selling the rope.
Naturally, former War on Drugs “czar” (notice they never say “fuhrer”?) Barry McCaffrey is part of the team. How could we build a Brave New World without him?
Time to work on creative ways to defeat this obscenity against privacy and liberty…
Any bets that Brijot’s legal counsel would scream the loudest about properly executed warrants should a raid for financial/time reporting/inventory records occur?
Any bets they'd cite the following in their complaint?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
[Thanks to KABA Newslinks for the tip.]
A Call to Action
"[E]ven though I am not an American, I care about gun rights and freedom. I believe, America is going to be the death knell of the global gun control movement, and if we can kill gun control in America, it will eventually collapse in every major democracy.
"And now, for action. This year, the House of Representatives and the Senate is composed of a more pro-gun body than ever. This means we have a real shot at passing HR-1703 - Second Amendment Protection Act 2005. It is a bill whose main target is to eliminate the sporting purpose requirement from Federal law, eliminating such things as the import ban and the ATF-introduced ban on certain shotguns in one 'fell swoop', further securing the argument that 'the guns are not for hunting' in law."
So writes MicroBalrog. Did you get that? He's not an American. He lives in Israel. But he's doing more to protect American gun rights than most domestic gun owners--by a long shot.
People who have things given to them, that would be us, too often don't appreciate what they've inherited. Sometimes it takes an observer to see things from outside to tell us we need to act.
UPDATE:
He's posted a more detailed call to action here.
"And now, for action. This year, the House of Representatives and the Senate is composed of a more pro-gun body than ever. This means we have a real shot at passing HR-1703 - Second Amendment Protection Act 2005. It is a bill whose main target is to eliminate the sporting purpose requirement from Federal law, eliminating such things as the import ban and the ATF-introduced ban on certain shotguns in one 'fell swoop', further securing the argument that 'the guns are not for hunting' in law."
So writes MicroBalrog. Did you get that? He's not an American. He lives in Israel. But he's doing more to protect American gun rights than most domestic gun owners--by a long shot.
People who have things given to them, that would be us, too often don't appreciate what they've inherited. Sometimes it takes an observer to see things from outside to tell us we need to act.
UPDATE:
He's posted a more detailed call to action here.
Friday, May 06, 2005
Feelings, Nothing More than Feelings
As the ninnies who bleat for government destruction of our rights have consistently demonstrated, it’s not about results. Commentator Martha Blume, in Chesapeake’s Bay Weekly calls for a Constitutional amendment: “The right of the people to feel safe from gun violence in their homes, neighborhoods, schools, places of worship, employment, on the streets and in any other public places shall not be infringed.”
Like the love song says, it’s about “Feelings, nothing more than feelings ... ”
My Rights Watch column for the May issue of GUNS Magazine is now online.
Like the love song says, it’s about “Feelings, nothing more than feelings ... ”
My Rights Watch column for the May issue of GUNS Magazine is now online.
A Slap on the Wrist
The Brady Campaign was fined $12K for making illegal campaign contributions "to various Democratic candidates."
$12K for this slick, well-financed, legally and politically connected, media-heralded national organization--but when Russ Howard, who put together a grassroots effort on a shoestring budget, tried to protect the names of supporters (after credible threats were made), he got steamrolled with the largest adminstrative fine in California history.
The rich anti-gunners get a slap on the wrist that can be covered from one donation by one of its Hollywood benefactors. The idealistic citizen who steps forward to protect gun rights has his life destroyed.
Yeah, that's the America patriots fought and died for.
If you're not aware of Russ Howard's story, you should be.
Once you are aware, he could really use some help with legal fees.
UPDATE:
David Hardy reminds us: "A couple of years ago, Brady was assessed $26,000 for violating the campaign reporting rules."
So they're REPEAT OFFENDERS.
That makes the disparity with Russ Howard's case all the more outrageous and evil.
$12K for this slick, well-financed, legally and politically connected, media-heralded national organization--but when Russ Howard, who put together a grassroots effort on a shoestring budget, tried to protect the names of supporters (after credible threats were made), he got steamrolled with the largest adminstrative fine in California history.
The rich anti-gunners get a slap on the wrist that can be covered from one donation by one of its Hollywood benefactors. The idealistic citizen who steps forward to protect gun rights has his life destroyed.
Yeah, that's the America patriots fought and died for.
If you're not aware of Russ Howard's story, you should be.
Once you are aware, he could really use some help with legal fees.
UPDATE:
David Hardy reminds us: "A couple of years ago, Brady was assessed $26,000 for violating the campaign reporting rules."
So they're REPEAT OFFENDERS.
That makes the disparity with Russ Howard's case all the more outrageous and evil.
Nostalgia and Magazine Blogging
the ten ring goes into more detail on the 50-year old issue of GUNS Magazine featured Wednesday on this site.
Pity Denise lost her original draft in a Blogger glitch, but this reconstruction of highlights is excellent.
Pity Denise lost her original draft in a Blogger glitch, but this reconstruction of highlights is excellent.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
California Bans Internet Use?
"The bill by Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Redondo Beach, which now moves to the Assembly, would prohibit use of computer-assisted hunting sites, bar such sites from operating in California and prohibit the importation or exportation of any animal or part of an animal killed using computer-assisted hunting."
Look, I'm not a hunter. I also happent to think that Internet hunting is ridiculous. But if you want to do it, that ain't my call.
What worries me is, how are they gonna know? Set up some sort of monitoring for all internet traffic? Block it at the ISP? What else will they intercept or block?
Or is this, as I suspect, simply more posturing calculated to gin up public hostility to gun owners by exploiting the emotions stirred up by a "virtually" non-existent "problem"?
I'll tell you one thing--if I belonged to the California Sportsmen's Association, Safari Club International or the Outdoor Sportsman's Coalition of California, all of which support this nonsense, I'd quit and never send them another cent.
Talk about useful idiots.
Look, I'm not a hunter. I also happent to think that Internet hunting is ridiculous. But if you want to do it, that ain't my call.
What worries me is, how are they gonna know? Set up some sort of monitoring for all internet traffic? Block it at the ISP? What else will they intercept or block?
Or is this, as I suspect, simply more posturing calculated to gin up public hostility to gun owners by exploiting the emotions stirred up by a "virtually" non-existent "problem"?
I'll tell you one thing--if I belonged to the California Sportsmen's Association, Safari Club International or the Outdoor Sportsman's Coalition of California, all of which support this nonsense, I'd quit and never send them another cent.
Talk about useful idiots.
The Perfect Mothers' Day Gift...
Jennifer Freeman of Liberty Belles tells us what that is.
Assuming, of course, that Mom isn't one in a "Million."
Assuming, of course, that Mom isn't one in a "Million."
Ve Haff Vays of Making You Talk…
…even if you don’t.
“Scientists from Japan and the United States have figured out how to read a person's mind by remotely measuring brain activity, extracting information of which the subject is not even aware. Science fiction? No. It's real.”
I got this from KABA Newslinks—a daily stop that ought to be part of every gun owner’s routine. I often enjoy the remarks posted by readers more than the story they’re commenting on.
As with all technological developments, including guns, this will be used for good or ill. It’s the “ill” part that worries me.
“Scientists from Japan and the United States have figured out how to read a person's mind by remotely measuring brain activity, extracting information of which the subject is not even aware. Science fiction? No. It's real.”
I got this from KABA Newslinks—a daily stop that ought to be part of every gun owner’s routine. I often enjoy the remarks posted by readers more than the story they’re commenting on.
As with all technological developments, including guns, this will be used for good or ill. It’s the “ill” part that worries me.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
GUNS Magazine: May 1955 Issue
"The Legend of Davy Crockett"
"The Scotch Pistol Mystery"
"A Six Shooter for TV Cowboys"
What's not to like? And it's free!
The May 1955 issue of GUNS Magazine is now online in .pdf format.
Inherit the Windbag
"Sounds like the Old West is returning to the Sunshine State!" Ron Reagan intros in his MSNBC discussion panel on Florida's new "stand your ground" law.
Ron mugs. Ron grimaces. Ron laughs at his own wit ("Snarf, snarf, snarf!").
Ron argues that the average person doesn't have the training or the judgment or the intelligence that police do, to know when it's appropriate to use lethal force.
Ron doesn't think a regular person would have time to react appropriately to an attack. Interestingly, Ron's guest and fellow citizen disarmament fanatic, Richard Aborn, argues just the opposite--he's against Florida's bill because he thinks people need to deliberate and cogitate and think about consequences and weigh and evaluate and think some more before deciding to consider responding to an immediate, life-endangering threat.
Ron speculates that if he pulled a knife on a woman and she responded by retrieving a gun instead of a wallet from her purse, he could take it away and use it against her.
I'm sure I could find some people who would love to see him try. Hey Ron, any time you want to give a public demonstration, have your people call my people.
"By the way, you're not packin' heat are ya?" Ron asks his other guest, CCRKBA's Alan Gottlieb. "Because if I ask you a threatening question I don't want you drawing down on me! Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
Yeah, maintain the bigoted lie that peaceable gun owners are prone to violence when they don't get their way. Hopefully, in the future, now that he has the benefit of hindsight for this sort of question, Alan will use it as an opportunity to correct the record and educate the viewers instead of laughing along with such catty insults.
"Untrained amateurs are notoriously bad at recognizing threats and responding to them with a cool head," Ron claims with authority. "The last thing we want is someone who's never been in this sort of situation before waving a gun around firing off rounds."
Right, Ron. Tell these people they were wrong.
"Hey everybody," Ron concludes, "I love to say this when we do this sort of segment. Keep your powder dry. Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
What a talentless moron. What a prime example of how inheriting a famous name puts totally unworthy people in the spotlight.
So, Ron, how does it feel to be MSNBC's answer to Paris Hilton? Snarf, snarf, snarf!
Ron mugs. Ron grimaces. Ron laughs at his own wit ("Snarf, snarf, snarf!").
Ron argues that the average person doesn't have the training or the judgment or the intelligence that police do, to know when it's appropriate to use lethal force.
Ron doesn't think a regular person would have time to react appropriately to an attack. Interestingly, Ron's guest and fellow citizen disarmament fanatic, Richard Aborn, argues just the opposite--he's against Florida's bill because he thinks people need to deliberate and cogitate and think about consequences and weigh and evaluate and think some more before deciding to consider responding to an immediate, life-endangering threat.
Ron speculates that if he pulled a knife on a woman and she responded by retrieving a gun instead of a wallet from her purse, he could take it away and use it against her.
I'm sure I could find some people who would love to see him try. Hey Ron, any time you want to give a public demonstration, have your people call my people.
"By the way, you're not packin' heat are ya?" Ron asks his other guest, CCRKBA's Alan Gottlieb. "Because if I ask you a threatening question I don't want you drawing down on me! Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
Yeah, maintain the bigoted lie that peaceable gun owners are prone to violence when they don't get their way. Hopefully, in the future, now that he has the benefit of hindsight for this sort of question, Alan will use it as an opportunity to correct the record and educate the viewers instead of laughing along with such catty insults.
"Untrained amateurs are notoriously bad at recognizing threats and responding to them with a cool head," Ron claims with authority. "The last thing we want is someone who's never been in this sort of situation before waving a gun around firing off rounds."
Right, Ron. Tell these people they were wrong.
"Hey everybody," Ron concludes, "I love to say this when we do this sort of segment. Keep your powder dry. Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
What a talentless moron. What a prime example of how inheriting a famous name puts totally unworthy people in the spotlight.
So, Ron, how does it feel to be MSNBC's answer to Paris Hilton? Snarf, snarf, snarf!
Gun Control=People Control
Writer William R. Tonso informs me that he's just published an anthology.
"Gun Control=People Control [is] a short collection of my pro-gun essays that have been published over the past twenty years in such publications as Reason, Liberty, Chronicles, and Gun Week . Three of the essays analyze the mainstream media bias against guns, two deal with guns and popular culture, four analyze the roots of the people-control agenda of the gun-prohibitionist movement, and two are spoof pieces. This collection is intended to be a think piece, not an up-to-date chronicle of the activities of the anti-gunners.
"[I]t's received favorable comments through reviews in America's 1st Freedom and Gun Week, and an interview on Larry Pratt's radio show. I'm scheduled to be on the NRA's Cam and Company tomorrow.
"The public can get the book through AuthorHouse, Amazon, or ordered through any of the major book stores.
"I'm a retired sociology prof and lifelong gun enthusiast who has written quite a bit on the social and cultural aspects of the gun issue."
Sounds good. I inserted a link in Prof. Tonso's name, above. Click on it and check out some of his work on the internet. If you like what you see, there's a book waiting to be bought.
"Gun Control=People Control [is] a short collection of my pro-gun essays that have been published over the past twenty years in such publications as Reason, Liberty, Chronicles, and Gun Week . Three of the essays analyze the mainstream media bias against guns, two deal with guns and popular culture, four analyze the roots of the people-control agenda of the gun-prohibitionist movement, and two are spoof pieces. This collection is intended to be a think piece, not an up-to-date chronicle of the activities of the anti-gunners.
"[I]t's received favorable comments through reviews in America's 1st Freedom and Gun Week, and an interview on Larry Pratt's radio show. I'm scheduled to be on the NRA's Cam and Company tomorrow.
"The public can get the book through AuthorHouse, Amazon, or ordered through any of the major book stores.
"I'm a retired sociology prof and lifelong gun enthusiast who has written quite a bit on the social and cultural aspects of the gun issue."
Sounds good. I inserted a link in Prof. Tonso's name, above. Click on it and check out some of his work on the internet. If you like what you see, there's a book waiting to be bought.
Seraphic Trigger Time
Screenwriter, novelist and blogger Robert J. Avrech teaches three Orthodox Jewish boys to shoot.
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
New "Eloi Award" Nominee
May I have the envelope, please?
And the winner is..."Death March" survivor and gun ban activist NANDY PACHECO!
And the winner is..."Death March" survivor and gun ban activist NANDY PACHECO!
Dianne Feinstein's Monumental Hysterics
"'For instance, a sniper atop the Washington Monument (with a .50-caliber rifle) could target anybody or anything within a four-mile radius, including the White House, the Capitol, every building on or around the Mall, and aircraft flying in and out of Reagan National Airport,' Feinstein said in a statement."
Senator, have you toured the Washington Monument lately? It is one of the most visibly guarded structures in the visibly guarded Capitol. Half the windows on each side have been sealed off from public viewing because they now contain "Homeland Security" surveillance cameras and equipment.
If someone truly wanted to do damage to this nation and its institutions, they'd gain political power and subvert the Republic from within.
But you know that, don't you?
Senator, have you toured the Washington Monument lately? It is one of the most visibly guarded structures in the visibly guarded Capitol. Half the windows on each side have been sealed off from public viewing because they now contain "Homeland Security" surveillance cameras and equipment.
If someone truly wanted to do damage to this nation and its institutions, they'd gain political power and subvert the Republic from within.
But you know that, don't you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)