I would not want to be one of these guys when things finally snap and a critical mass of people realize they're allowing themselves to be controlled by an illusion. [Watch]
Behold, a god who bleeds!
[Via roughdoc]
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
"Well You're Not Giving Me a Sensible Answer"
British subject and unethical snoop Piers Morgan puts his hands over his ears and shouts "Lalalalala!" as John Lott tries in vain to educate the ineducable. Meanwhile, Alan Dershowitz--who ought to frickin' know better--does us all a huge favor by putting the end game out there for all to hear. [Watch]
If It Quacks Like a Duck
We can no longer duck the issue of gun control [More]If you listen to this silly goose, all you'll be able to do is duck.
And They Say There Are No Stupid Questions
In America, is it more important that a 24-year-old be able to buy an AR-15 weapon and unlimited rounds of ammo -- or that a 6-year-old girl be able to go to the movies with her mom and return home safely? [More]Nice logical fallacy there, pally. Read much Pynchon?
And then there's this:
Should the Second Amendment allow a man to freely buy weapons, ammunition, body armor or other products, some of which have little purpose other than to cause destruction and panic?Typical statist, who thinks rights are what government allows. Never mind the rest of the panty-wringing, he needed to complete a sentence.
Still, all this absolutely numb-skulled hysteria by those who would inflict their enmity upon us encourages me that borrowing Voltaire's prayer is paying off.
Whistleblowers Respond to Intimidators
Don't Threaten Us [More]This is a very good article by Katie Pavlich that gets needed information out there that the lapdog press won't, as they're focused instead on sanitizing the record of abuse.
One version of the letter referred to is posted here, and was the basis for this write-up.
Bottom line: If those doing their utmost to squelch the investigation and redirect the effort to more citizen disarmament had really done their jobs after being repeatedly requested, the audit environment would not have allowed an Operation Fast and Furious to happen.
[Via Robert F]
Might Just Be Worth a Try at That
Bloomberg Suggests Police Stop Protecting People Until Gun Control Enacted [Watch]Yeah, let's start with your taxpayer-funded armed bodyguards.
Can you imagine how this would blow up in his face if the illusion of a safety net was lifted and all people suddenly realized that only they can protect themselves?
[Via Matthew P]
Distinguished by What?
This is actually kind of funny in a pathetic sort of way--their entire 'distinguished panel" consists of regressives. And that's who their audience will be. [Read]
Note people who want to win elections aren't very anxious to test out their "myth" theory...at least until after November.
Note people who want to win elections aren't very anxious to test out their "myth" theory...at least until after November.
An American 'Con'servative
People on the pro-gun side, however, tend to carry on like fire-breathing fundamentalists at a tent revival. They meet any proposal to restrict weaponry or ammunition, no matter how sensible, as an attempt to give a toehold to the devil. [More]It is, you dunderhead! Note he doesn't flesh out specifically what he considers "sensible".
Sterile bee queen Rod Dreher, writing in the Brit press instead of his own magazine, would have "conservative" drones expend their efforts fruitlessly, and ultimately suicidally, by following him. And this is a guy who writes with an apparently straight face "To the extent that I care about economics and foreign policy, I would be likely to vote Obama."
And just to let you know what else he and his ilk consider reasonable and sensible, note:
If you’re a conservative fed up with the narrowness of thought on our side, we could use your financial help in building up this institution.Meaning be more like anti-gun neocon hero Bill Buckley.
Which means focus on the "con" in "The American Conservative." And reject them as utter frauds.
The Next Push
Look for ammo sale infringement efforts at the state level as a topic the antis think they can get traction with. [Read]
We're the Only Ones Threatening Fashionably Enough
“Every time they talk to you it’s in a threatening fashion,” long-time resident Emory Langlolies said during Sunday’s meeting. [More]Bingo! But they break your stuff, you can't get basic services and you're not allowed to speak at council meetings.
So, now, Mr. Langolies, is there a lesson here that people--especially those in Massachusetts--maybe oughtta have learned by now...? Besides moving to a freer place and taking their idiot voting habits with them?
Think of It as an Admission
President Obama and Mitt Romney are too afraid to take on the National Rifle Association because they fear it will hurt their chances for victory in November's election [More]So, Mike Lupica, you wretched Fourth Estate Fifth Columnist, that doesn't tell you anything? Like maybe a critical mass of people are no longer buying the swill that dominates your "profession"?
I wouldn't be too hard on them, though--you don't "have a plan to prevent the next senseless gun-related slaughter" either, although I'm sure mass shooters counting on citizen disarmament to ensure their successful media triumphs appreciate such efforts.
The Mark of the Beast...
...is evidently written in red ink. [Read]
Jane Harman was a real nemesis of gun owners when she was in Congress.
I love the way people trying to force legal changes down our throats also wield ownership interests in the "watchdog press" that's supposed to be keeping them honest.
And recall it was at her and Sarah Brady's media propaganda fest that first sensitized me personally to the chilling reality that state enforcers would be the ones to determine just who they would recognize as an "Authorized Journalist," which was the catalyst that eventually led to my coining the term. So it's not enough for them to dominate the media--they have to squash the little guy, all the while presenting themselves as their champions.
Jane Harman was a real nemesis of gun owners when she was in Congress.
I love the way people trying to force legal changes down our throats also wield ownership interests in the "watchdog press" that's supposed to be keeping them honest.
And recall it was at her and Sarah Brady's media propaganda fest that first sensitized me personally to the chilling reality that state enforcers would be the ones to determine just who they would recognize as an "Authorized Journalist," which was the catalyst that eventually led to my coining the term. So it's not enough for them to dominate the media--they have to squash the little guy, all the while presenting themselves as their champions.
PAGE NINE No. 113
If you're not on his mailing list, you're missing out on not just great and timely information, but precision analysis. Still, don't mistake that for dry regurgitation of citations and statistics--he writes with wit, and makes it evident you're reading the thoughts of someone who knows what he's talking about and loves doing it.
You can sign up to receive his updates--and he doesn't flood your inbox, so no worries there--by going to his Page Nine Index page, where you can also read prior editions.
The picture on the right with me in the background, wearing one of Alan's "Guns Save Lives" stickers on my lapel, is from the 2011 Gun Rights Policy Conference. Otis McDonald obliged my request for an autograph and as no writing surface was conveniently present, Alan cheerfully put his back into it.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Impressive
Most impressive.
But you are not a Jedi yet.
And there's no doubt it my mind you'd be absolutely useless in a real world situation if the best you can come up with is "Give 'em what they want."
Companies actually pay money for your advice? Do you offer a money back guarantee if anyone dumb enough to listen to you gets hurt or worse, or should we assume anyone that witless was bound to check out sooner than later anyway?
But you are not a Jedi yet.
And there's no doubt it my mind you'd be absolutely useless in a real world situation if the best you can come up with is "Give 'em what they want."
Companies actually pay money for your advice? Do you offer a money back guarantee if anyone dumb enough to listen to you gets hurt or worse, or should we assume anyone that witless was bound to check out sooner than later anyway?
My First Reaction is "No"
My second is, that's one way to hurt Hollywood where they'll feel it...[Read]
I'll stick with my first reaction, because there's no shortage of bleaters who'd go along with it, but there's no way I'd submit to a search or wanding just to see a damn movie.
I'll stick with my first reaction, because there's no shortage of bleaters who'd go along with it, but there's no way I'd submit to a search or wanding just to see a damn movie.
Don't Feed the Cowards
I typically just ignore these, because that infuriates trolls more than anything else, but this was useful to illustrate the "quality" of enemies we attract.
Of course this sick, pathetic coward is afraid to even tell me this in an email, let alone let me know who he is so I could arrange for him to tell me to my face. And he and I both know his repeated overtures of hate also mean I occupy his seething little mind.
Now let me tell you what will happen next with this predictable loser: He'll try to post a series of increasingly strident comments calling me names and telling me I'm the coward for not publishing his comments. But he'll never identify himself to me because he is afraid of me, which just shows what a contemptible little piece of shit he is--and he knows it. And after a while, not getting a reaction, he'll give up until next time.
Can you imagine being so pathetic and demented you send horrible death wishes like this to people anonymously? Looking on the bright side, it is impossible that this is a balanced and happy person, which means that gives me something else to laugh at him about.
And which means he's a typical "progressive" for "gun control". Remember last time this happened--and it came from the Brady Campaign blog's administrative log-in page?
[Click on graphic to enlarge]
Now let me tell you what will happen next with this predictable loser: He'll try to post a series of increasingly strident comments calling me names and telling me I'm the coward for not publishing his comments. But he'll never identify himself to me because he is afraid of me, which just shows what a contemptible little piece of shit he is--and he knows it. And after a while, not getting a reaction, he'll give up until next time.
Can you imagine being so pathetic and demented you send horrible death wishes like this to people anonymously? Looking on the bright side, it is impossible that this is a balanced and happy person, which means that gives me something else to laugh at him about.
And which means he's a typical "progressive" for "gun control". Remember last time this happened--and it came from the Brady Campaign blog's administrative log-in page?
Armed American Radio Recap
Mark Walters has posted the archives to last night's Armed American Radio program. I was on in the the first hour and rejoined the program for the third hour "Roundtable."
Other guests included John Lott in the first hour, Lt. Col. Dave Grossman delivering "seminar" information in the second hour that people pay good money for--and you'll hear why, Alan Korwin and George "Mad Ogre" Hill.
Mark's opening 15-minute monologue on the Colorado shootings is must-hear radio, just outstandingly well done. I'm proud of him for articulating things so well. He shared with me a file recorded by two separate radio stations that is freaky and differs from his archived version--when he says "pure evil" at 26 seconds into the file, and his voice suddenly gets scary deep. Station engineers can't explain it.
He'll be sharing more thoughts today at 3:30 Eastern on the Janet Mefferd Show (click the "Listen Now" button at the appointed time).
Other guests included John Lott in the first hour, Lt. Col. Dave Grossman delivering "seminar" information in the second hour that people pay good money for--and you'll hear why, Alan Korwin and George "Mad Ogre" Hill.
Mark's opening 15-minute monologue on the Colorado shootings is must-hear radio, just outstandingly well done. I'm proud of him for articulating things so well. He shared with me a file recorded by two separate radio stations that is freaky and differs from his archived version--when he says "pure evil" at 26 seconds into the file, and his voice suddenly gets scary deep. Station engineers can't explain it.
He'll be sharing more thoughts today at 3:30 Eastern on the Janet Mefferd Show (click the "Listen Now" button at the appointed time).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)