In re: “Toyota Awards $1.12 Million in Scholarships to 100 High School Seniors” (PR Newswire)
“Theodoros Milonopoulos, a Toyota Community Scholar residing in Los Angeles, is a prime example of the dedication to community service exhibited by this year's class. Through his leadership and effort in the area of gun control, the City of Los Angeles banned .50 caliber sniper rifles, plus reauthorized the Federal Assault Weapons Ban. Also, this Scholar - along with the Los Angeles Police Department - organized a rally where 2,000 crime guns were melted down.
“Consequently, Milonopoulos, like many of the Scholars, found community service to be the roadmap to what he wants to do in the future. ‘I plan to become a lawyer after studying constitutional law. It is my dream to serve in Congress so that I can continue to be the voice for our nation's youth.’"
Congratulations, idiots. You just lost all future business from me and every gun owner reading this who cares about the Second Amendment.
Perhaps you think America is ripe for Japanese-style gun control.
You are outrageously mistaken.
As Admiral Yamamoto is reputed to have said, “You cannot invade America. There is a rifle behind every blade of grass.”
It’s going to stay that way—no matter what subversion blossoming tyrant wannabes like foolish little Theo and his enablers, like you, dream up.
You couldn’t just sell cars and trucks, and not tamper with sacred institutions in your host country? You had to go and make an enemy of men like me?
I’ve seen what happens when Japan succeeds in disarming its victims. I note the Japanese government still hasn’t apologized to the people of China for the Rape of Nanking. It looks like Japan is none too popular there right now.
I’m going to do what I can to make sure Toyota Motor Sales, USA, is none too popular here.
You can do one of two things:
1. Fire the idiots responsible for awarding Theo his grant and apologize to American gun owners, or
2. follow Mr. Garrison’s advice.
[Thanks to Say Uncle for the tip on this.]
Here's an opportunity to make some money manufacturing a bumper sticker I WILL put on my car!
ReplyDeleteJust who do they think they are???
ReplyDeleteGood for them.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, where in the 2nd ammendment does it say that anybody can have sniper rifles?
Aren't sniper rifles made for snipers, who kill people?
You care so much about guns, how about gun victims?
David, I'm with you. First, as you are, I'm an advocate of self-determination (freedom and responsibility), otherwise known as Liberty. I resent corporate-backed attacks thereon.
ReplyDeleteI'm also an avid back roads driver, with the natural need for good 4WD gear. No matter how good Toyota's products, that isn't enough to counter their negative social impacts by promoting this kind of narcissistic, counterproductive nonsense. I can't buy their products and support them financially if this is the way they'll use my money.
Peter Drucker, known in some circles as "the godfather of modern management," once said that businesses should make the exact impacts they want to make in their market, and seek to reduce to zero all others. He said that social activism is destructive of the first task of management: business performance.
And Toyota's support for a pointless gun ban is a good example, because many of us will turn our sight to other vehicles whose makers aren't promoting this idiocy.
As to toad734, a "sniper" rifle could be any gun. Mostly, the guns we're talking about are used for target shooting and nothing else. If you want to put a check on violence and murder, start by ending abuse of government power. Governments killed far more innocents in the 20th century than all non-government criminals put together have for centuries. And the 21st century is off to an auspicious start.
a "sniper rifle" is any rifle with a scope on it. even a pellet gun could be classified as a "sniper rifle"
ReplyDeletethat is the dumbest thing ive ever heard toad
It takes a certain amount of gall for a business to come into someone else's country, displace the native automaking industry, and decide how the people of that country should live their lives.
ReplyDeleteToad734
ReplyDelete- Liberty isn't given.
- Scribbles on paper are a reminder, a note, nothing more.
- The 2nd is specifically about armed conflict. It'd be a better argument that hunting weapons are unconstitutional as they have nothing to do with militias or preserving the security of a free state.
the ignorance of the modern society, people with cell phones kill more people then people wielding fire arms, and if people would read and understand the constitution, political reps included, they would better understand the need of such non-negotiable admendments, if these admendments rights and freedoms do not fit your liking then you have the freedom to voice it, but not the freedom to remove my rights., and if living under such personal freedoms and rights is too trying for you then maybe russia, china, japan, iran, libia, or other like countries will be better fitting for you to relinquish your United States citizenship for and quit trying to ruin my day. Thank you very much.DEB.........AND barccy, you might want to study up on your "specifically" a little more as you obviously are repeating ignorance of someone else repeating ignorance and trying to sell a belief not FACT.
ReplyDelete