Nicki and Kevin can't believe how stupid some people are.
Just remember--not only are some people stupid, but their votes cancel out ours.
You don't think all this talk about spreading "democracy" has anything to do with relying on the ease with which stupid people and their opinions can be manipulated, do you?
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
From the "I'm the only One Professional Enough" Files
Good thing Andy only lets Barney keep one bullet.
Youth Funds, Not Tougher Gun Rules, Needed, Cotler Says
If I may:
Music by Leonard Bernstein, lyrics by Stephen Sondheim.
© 1956, 1957 Amberson Holdings LLC and Stephen Sondheim. Copyright renewed.
Leonard Bernstein Music Publishing Company LLC, Publisher.
Dear kindly Sergeant Krupke,From West Side Story
You gotta understand,
It's just our bringin' up-ke
That gets us out of hand.
Our mothers all are junkies,
Our fathers all are drunks.
Golly Moses, natcherly we're punks!
Gee, Officer Krupke, we're very upset;
We never had the love that ev'ry child oughta get.
We ain't no delinquents,
We're misunderstood.
Deep down inside us there is good!
Music by Leonard Bernstein, lyrics by Stephen Sondheim.
© 1956, 1957 Amberson Holdings LLC and Stephen Sondheim. Copyright renewed.
Leonard Bernstein Music Publishing Company LLC, Publisher.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
“It must be legal,” she said. “The police are here taking stuff, too.”
Things are gonna get real interesting in the next few days and weeks.
Some people are gonna be real glad they have guns.
Some people are gonna be real glad they have guns.
It's Time to Renew!
Why does going through the firearm permitting process in South Africa remind me of a scene from Terry Gilliam's "Brazil"?
If Only We Got Rid of Weapons...
...people couldn't possibly kill themselves.
Just ask this poor wretch who submitted to the bend-'n-spread-'em at the Superdome.
That's a rate of 30 deaths per 100,000--every 3 days--in a disarmed, guarded 24/7 populace where the State provides for all?
If those are the odds for being a protected refugee, how bad can taking care of yourself be?
Just ask this poor wretch who submitted to the bend-'n-spread-'em at the Superdome.
There are more than 10,000 people in the arena.
Officials had earlier reported two deaths at the Superdome, and now, they report that someone died Tuesday after plunging from an upper level of the stadium. They say the person probably jumped.
That's a rate of 30 deaths per 100,000--every 3 days--in a disarmed, guarded 24/7 populace where the State provides for all?
If those are the odds for being a protected refugee, how bad can taking care of yourself be?
The Louisiana Superdome of Shame
I posted about National Guardsmen disarming Superdome refugees on Sunday, relying on hastily transcribed notes. Here's confirmation and commentary from, of all places, Pravda:
Watching news coverage of the refugees trying to enter the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans for safety from the approaching force-five Hurricane Katrina, I was incredulous how the people attempting to enter the stadium were being treated by the national guard troops and local police. The people were made to stand for hours outside in the awful Louisiana climate while they were admitted one or two adults at a time so they could be searched "for firearms and alcohol."
... The lamp of freedom has been blown out by force-five bureaucrats, their sycophants and their head-embedded media enablers who will insure that it will never get re-ignited. For our own good, of course.
Shameless Plug: The Bear Necessities
“I love you, I love you, I love you, I love you.”—Timothy Treadwell, setting up his video camera inches from a grizzly bear
“Grunt. Snort. Crunch. Snap. Munch. Gulp.”—Grizzly, loosely translated as “I love you, too.”
"The Bear Necessities" is my October Rights Watch column for GUNS Magazine, on sale now at indispensable newsstands throughout the Republic.
A Gathering Storm?
I just received the following response to my "Trouble in Paradise" concerns:
My reply:
We shall see...
"All of the current rules for guns at the ranch are not inforceable due to the fact that they are all just word of mouth. Nothing has ever been written down and passed by the board. We are not trying to take away your gun rights. Our primary concern is the safety of all of the owners. I intend to get a concessus of all the owners present at the meeting to see what the majority considers fair. Since you have such a strong interest I hope that you will be present for the meeting 12 noon on 24 Sept. 05 at the Dance hall."
My reply:
I don’t know if I can make the meeting or not due to other obligations that weekend, but don’t think that should be the only forum for evaluating the proposed criteria. If we’re talking about at the Range, there are many professional references to consult for establishing protocols. If we’re talking about on Ranch property in general, things get problematic.
I’d like to see what it is you will be proposing, and also would appreciate a summary of your credentials for establishing “gun safety rules.” I’d also like to know what the incident was that makes people feel a need to address this, and what evidence you have that a set of rules you propose will eliminate the risk of a recurrence.
Will you send these to me?
We shall see...
The Answer to "Gun Crime" in Canada...
...is apparently "a single, loud voice."
Why didn't we think of that here?
Oh, and closed-door meetings away from the prying disarmed victim pool...I mean, public.
My God, does this fool realize what some of us would give to be able to say that in the US (at least those of us not calling on them to "enforce existing gun laws")?
Surely they have some money left over after that $2 Billion gun registry "boondoggle"?
Why didn't we think of that here?
Oh, and closed-door meetings away from the prying disarmed victim pool...I mean, public.
"It's about time somebody put the feds on the spot. Where have they been? Who are they, even?"
My God, does this fool realize what some of us would give to be able to say that in the US (at least those of us not calling on them to "enforce existing gun laws")?
"Thus, the progressive dream team shapes up, a made-in-Toronto crime-busting squad that combines tough enforcement with all the increased social spending that senior governments and the private sector can afford."
Surely they have some money left over after that $2 Billion gun registry "boondoggle"?
Monday, August 29, 2005
Kaine Caught Stealing NRA's Thunder
"'It's no surprise that Tim Kaine is attempting to hide his anti-gun past from gun owners,' said Chris W. Cox, the NRA's chief lobbyist, in an interview. He challenged Kaine's assertion that he was a leader in bringing Project Exile to Richmond."
Translation: "How dare you claim credit for our gun control legislation."
O Canada
The Canadian national gun registry doesn't stop "gun violence."
It is a "$2-billion boondoggle."
They should "shut down their useless registry and put the money into actual police officers fighting crime."
But they won't.
Don't believe me, believe The Edmonton Sun.
This is a good real-world lesson to throw back at domestic antis who claim registries here will prevent violent crime.
If somebody wants to know which Americans own guns, the answer ought to be: assume all of us--and conduct yourself accordingly.
It is a "$2-billion boondoggle."
They should "shut down their useless registry and put the money into actual police officers fighting crime."
But they won't.
Don't believe me, believe The Edmonton Sun.
This is a good real-world lesson to throw back at domestic antis who claim registries here will prevent violent crime.
If somebody wants to know which Americans own guns, the answer ought to be: assume all of us--and conduct yourself accordingly.
Sunday, August 28, 2005
"Everyone Certainly is Appreciative"
That's a quote from the Fox News reporter on scene at the Superdome in New Orleans, thanking two National Guard privates for confiscating, among other things, a fork, plastic disposable razors, allen and ratchet wrenches, pocket knives, scissors, combs, and nail clippers, from refugees seeking shelter from Hurricane Katrina.
People must undergo bag and body checks for "contraband." If you have prescriptions, you must have ID to match. And of course, no weapons are allowed.
When asked why a fingernail file was confiscated, one of the privates replied "Fingernail files have a point on them. We just think it will be safer."
Ah yes. The militia is now the National Guard, right?
Back to Geraldo Rivera, who is relieved.
"I'm glad for all the people seeking shelter, that's all they've got."
Geraldo, of course, insisted on carrying a gun to protect his own precious hide when on assignment in Afghanistan.
Make no mistake--this is the way things will go down in every future major emergency. And no doubt everyone will certainly be appreciative.
People must undergo bag and body checks for "contraband." If you have prescriptions, you must have ID to match. And of course, no weapons are allowed.
When asked why a fingernail file was confiscated, one of the privates replied "Fingernail files have a point on them. We just think it will be safer."
Ah yes. The militia is now the National Guard, right?
Back to Geraldo Rivera, who is relieved.
"I'm glad for all the people seeking shelter, that's all they've got."
Geraldo, of course, insisted on carrying a gun to protect his own precious hide when on assignment in Afghanistan.
Make no mistake--this is the way things will go down in every future major emergency. And no doubt everyone will certainly be appreciative.
Another Young Skull Full of Mush With a Big Forum and a Bigger 'But'
Sez 11th-grader David Albright :
"When I was a child, I spake as a child. I understood as a child, I thought as a child."
Too bad the alleged "grown-ups" at the Democrat and Chronicle , who pass along such tripe as reasoned argument worthy of adult consideration, never matured to realize it is long past the time for them to "put away childish things."
"I consider myself to be very conservative, but...I find another area of agreement in gun control. I believe the law should be stricter in regard to the possession particularly of assault-style weapons. Having stricter regulations should make it easier for police to reduce crime...It is very important for Republicans and Democrats to work together. Rather than focusing on differences and personalities, parties should try to find areas of agreement. Compromise will, of course, still be needed to get things done. Rather than putting all of their effort into their own agendas, Democrats and Republicans in Congress should work toward what is best for Americans."
"When I was a child, I spake as a child. I understood as a child, I thought as a child."
Too bad the alleged "grown-ups" at the Democrat and Chronicle , who pass along such tripe as reasoned argument worthy of adult consideration, never matured to realize it is long past the time for them to "put away childish things."
Always Low Coverage-Always
The Smallest Minority tells us how the media is handling another Wal-Mart shooting.
In the Shadow of 'Braveheart'
Publicola points us to a great site honoring William Wallace.
This guy David R. Ross appears to understand that he lives in a conquered and occupied country. I sent him the following:
As you know, Scotland is subject to virtually complete civilian disarmament imposed by its English rulers and abetted by Scottish MPs.
What is the position of your organization on the rights of freemen, including to bear arms in defense of self and country? Is it consistent with Wallace’s?
We'll see if he really gets it or not.
Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others
MEMBERS of Britain’s elite have been selected as priority cases to receive scarce pills and vaccinations at the taxpayers’ expense if the country is hit by a deadly bird flu outbreak.
Let's play the substitution word game:
MEMBERS of Britain’s elite have been selected as priority cases to receive scarce armed protection at the taxpayers’ expense if the country is hit by a deadly civil violence outbreak.
Some animals are more equal than others. Of course we knew that.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
May I Have the Envelope, Please?
The August Eloi Award goes to Pete Gitlin, of Phoenix, AZ.
Runner-up honors are shared by Penny and Pete Peters of Everett, WA.
Congratulations to Pete, Penny and Pete. Your Morlock masters are so pleased with you, they will eat you last.
Unless they're hungry and you're handy.
Runner-up honors are shared by Penny and Pete Peters of Everett, WA.
Congratulations to Pete, Penny and Pete. Your Morlock masters are so pleased with you, they will eat you last.
Unless they're hungry and you're handy.
Scarborough Fair Update: 1st Report BS
Looks like the guy shot at the Canadian anti-gun barbecue wasn't what he was reported to be.
Looks like Natalie Alcoba and the National Post have some explaining to do about how, in their zeal to promote an agenda, they got the basic facts so thoroughly wrong.
This is a useful reminder to all--me included--about assuming that, just because something appears in the media, it bears any relation to the facts.
Looks like Natalie Alcoba and the National Post have some explaining to do about how, in their zeal to promote an agenda, they got the basic facts so thoroughly wrong.
This is a useful reminder to all--me included--about assuming that, just because something appears in the media, it bears any relation to the facts.
Do You Wear That License on Your Collar?
The Toledo Free Press is reporting that although a man with a temporary emergency concealed handgun license was not charged with a crime, police have seen fit to confiscate and hold his handgun (despite an Ohio law which suggests such action by the Toledo police officers was illegal).
What the state giveth, the state can take away--and they have a voluntary registration list with which to do it.
It also allows them to dictate the rules for carrying, most importantly including where they say you may not.
What other right must we petition for permission and pay for the "privilege" of exercising?
Unfortunately, most of the activist gun owner community has been seduced into believing this is progress. They have allowed the Constitutional bright line of "shall not be infringed" to be dimmed and diffused.
Only perceived "radicals" commit the heresy of suggesting that what we have might not be the progress everyone claims it is. Those who do must be prepared to endure wrath and scorn. The illusion of the Emperor's clothes is strong--all his ministers tell us how fine they are.
As my pal Steiger says (about much more than just this issue), "We've been conned. Bare-ass naked in the public square conned."
[KABA Newslinks]
Friday, August 26, 2005
I'M the NRA
CIVIS PROELIATOR explains why he isn’t an NRA member, and has some kind words for WarOnGuns in his reasoning—particularly referencing yesterday’s post about the Rick Santorum interview.
For the record, because I’ve been accused of “NRA bashing” by more than one paid staffer, I’d like to share part of an email I sent to one a few years back. Bottom line—I don’t bash the NRA—I AM the NRA. My beef is with current association management, and the directors and members who give it carte blanche, branding anyone who dissents an enemy.
For the record, because I’ve been accused of “NRA bashing” by more than one paid staffer, I’d like to share part of an email I sent to one a few years back. Bottom line—I don’t bash the NRA—I AM the NRA. My beef is with current association management, and the directors and members who give it carte blanche, branding anyone who dissents an enemy.
"Based on your history" is the second time you have accused me of being anti-NRA, without ever giving me one concrete example-- although I realize you regard public disagreement over policy as an "attack". I am a Life Member. I was a Golden Eagle for several years. I am a long-time Members Council activist and former officer-- for years. I single-handedly produced and distributed (and paid for out of my own pocket more times than not) the Council's newsletter-- for years. On my own initiative I created the Council's first fundraiser-- designed, produced and sold T-shirts that netted the small organization thousands of dollars. I sat outside of gun stores and ranges recruiting members, putting up with harassment from antis in passing cars. I marched with the Council at public events, again enduring no small amount of harassment. I manned the booth at events. I worked political campaigns supported by the NRA-- everything from manning phones to walking precincts.
That is my "history"--question someone else's loyalty. I have done more raw volunteer work for the organization than 99% of your members ever have or will. The fact is that institutional arrogance from employees like yourself led me to conclude that my contributions to 2A would be best achieved pursuing my own, as you put it, "agenda." The (small) part of that agenda that involves NRA is motivated by a desire to see the organization reformed. It's certainly no secret that many hard core gun activists are fed up with the Association-- or more precisely, its management. Unlike them, I don't advocate leaving it-- I advocate holding its officers accountable to a constructionist interpretation of the Second Amendment and the Association Bylaws-- something we hardly see when Wayne comes out endorsing "gun free schools", and calling on the government to "enforce existing gun laws" and the like.
Clarification on "Disarmed" DC
There appears to be a general misconception that guns are not allowed in Washington DC. The War on Guns would like to take this opportunity to correct this flawed perception. DC is awash in guns. All the "right" people have them.
Are You Going to Scarborough Fair?
A Canadian anti-gun activist has been shot and killed in an altercation at a Stop the Violence barbecue in Scarborough.
Some people find out they're dead wrong the hard way.
Too bad he didn't have a gun to protect himself.
But then again, if he'd had one, he would have been violating citizen disarmament edicts he endorsed. And we see how effective those were at stopping his assailant.
From the way he's been described, he truly did seem like a courageous and caring man. Unfortunately, when dealing with evil, that is just not enough.
UPDATE: It turns out most of this report was BS.
Some people find out they're dead wrong the hard way.
Too bad he didn't have a gun to protect himself.
But then again, if he'd had one, he would have been violating citizen disarmament edicts he endorsed. And we see how effective those were at stopping his assailant.
From the way he's been described, he truly did seem like a courageous and caring man. Unfortunately, when dealing with evil, that is just not enough.
UPDATE: It turns out most of this report was BS.
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Cheek to Cheek With Senator Rick Santorum
I finally had time to go through the September issue of American Rifleman, which features a Wayne LaPierre/Chris Cox tag team suck-up session masked as an interview titled "Face to Face With Senator Rick Santorum."
The subhead tells us the senator "receives an 'A+' grade from the NRA Political Victory Fund."
Gun Owners of America gives him a "C" rating. Why the disparity?
For one thing, the senator's own words show him in lock-step with NRA management.
"In addition," Santorum continues, "I support programs such as Project Exile that have been successful in dramatically reducing violent gun crime."
Oh, for God's sake. Go read this.
I guess if you repeat something long enough, you might get some Kool-Aid drinkers who take things at face value without fact-checking to buy into it.
NRA's Project Exile showcase cities are experiencing murder rates at "crisis" levels. In Philadelphia, police are reduced to begging the public for help in identifying killers, and Richmond actually saw a murder increase in 2004 while national numbers declined.
NRA management needs to be told by its membership--in no uncertain terms--that they can't have it both ways. They can't tell the antis that gun control doesn't work, and then turn around and recommend gun control.
NRA members need to understand that "enforcing existing gun laws" is exactly what the feds were doing at Waco and Ruby Ridge.
The subhead tells us the senator "receives an 'A+' grade from the NRA Political Victory Fund."
Gun Owners of America gives him a "C" rating. Why the disparity?
For one thing, the senator's own words show him in lock-step with NRA management.
"I support strict enforcement of current federal gun laws...My overarching position on gun legislation, and I also believe, the Republican Party's position, is that before we pass new laws to restrict Second Amendment rights, we must enforce the laws currently on the books to determine whether they are truly effective, rather than pass more redundant, ineffective laws."Note the concern is wholly whether or not an edict will be "effective," not whether it is Constitutional. Perhaps Sen. Santorum and Messrs. LaPierre and Cox would explain where the Constitution provides for any federal gun laws, and how that squares with "shall not be infringed." Perhaps they could explain to us why their focus isn't on repealing, rather than enforcing existing infringements.
"In addition," Santorum continues, "I support programs such as Project Exile that have been successful in dramatically reducing violent gun crime."
Oh, for God's sake. Go read this.
I guess if you repeat something long enough, you might get some Kool-Aid drinkers who take things at face value without fact-checking to buy into it.
NRA's Project Exile showcase cities are experiencing murder rates at "crisis" levels. In Philadelphia, police are reduced to begging the public for help in identifying killers, and Richmond actually saw a murder increase in 2004 while national numbers declined.
NRA management needs to be told by its membership--in no uncertain terms--that they can't have it both ways. They can't tell the antis that gun control doesn't work, and then turn around and recommend gun control.
NRA members need to understand that "enforcing existing gun laws" is exactly what the feds were doing at Waco and Ruby Ridge.
The Asylum is Open
Nicki Fellenzer wants a place where she can post on topics that wouldn't fit over at The Liberty Zone (like the Clay Aiken thong), so she's checked herself in to Nicki's Asylum.
The Clay Aiken thong.
Good grief.
C'mon, Nicki, not before breakfast...:-)
The Clay Aiken thong.
Good grief.
C'mon, Nicki, not before breakfast...:-)
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
When Sarah Gets Her Wish
Here's an appalling story to throw back into the faces of gungrabbing police statists:
Yep, we need more sensible gun laws. Only the police are professional enough to be trusted with carrying firearms in public. We need to get in step with the rest of the world.
For the children.
"City where police gun down children...
"1,195 people were killed by police here in 2003, an alarming number of them shot in cold blood."
Yep, we need more sensible gun laws. Only the police are professional enough to be trusted with carrying firearms in public. We need to get in step with the rest of the world.
For the children.
Trouble in Paradise
My wife and I have been owners at R-Ranch in the Sequoias since before the kids were born. It's been great for them and us. We've always loved the place and go up several times a year to restore our souls (and use the gun range).
As with anything where other people are involved, disagreements spring up. I've stayed out of the politics of the place because that's not why I bought in, and I get into enough scraps down here in Flatland. But now it looks like a fight to the finish is being forced on me and I won't be able to remain sidelined.
One of the Board members just sent this out via the Ranch's e-news update:
My reply:
The implications--if such rules are imposed and allowed to stand--reach far beyond the borders of Ranch property. I have some ideas on where I want to take this and will post updates as they happen. In the meantime, suggestions on legal avenues to explore and cite references will be appreciated.
As with anything where other people are involved, disagreements spring up. I've stayed out of the politics of the place because that's not why I bought in, and I get into enough scraps down here in Flatland. But now it looks like a fight to the finish is being forced on me and I won't be able to remain sidelined.
One of the Board members just sent this out via the Ranch's e-news update:
Rules for Firearms
A couple of month ago there was an incident on the ranch involving a gun. When we checked the ranch rules we found we had no written rules dealing with the use and caring of firearms on the ranch.
Earl [the Board president--DC] gave me the task of coming up with some rules for the safety of all.
I have scheduled the dance hall for a meeting of all, who are concerned with the issue. The next board meeting has been change to 24 Sept. 10 A.M. So I have reserved the dance hall for 12 Noon, 24 Sept. to have a meeting. We have several owners who are interested in attending the meeting, but I would like to get as many owners as possible to attend and participate in the debate. I would like the rules that we give to the board for review to be a consensus of a large group rather than just a few.
I would appreciate it if you would run an article to let all the owners know about the meeting. I will have a list of what I think the rules should be, but that will only be a base to start from. I will chair the committee and will try to get a secretary to take notes. All who attend will be members of the committee.
My reply:
The last thing we need is politically correct hysteria limiting the right of rational free Americans to keep and bear arms on what is their own property. One “incident” is hardly cause for infringing on my rights. That’s the same excuse well-meaning (or sometimes subversive) fools use for imposing “gun control” on society at large, and the results are always the same: the goblins have what they want when and where they want it, and the “good” people are helpless.
One incident out of the 15 years I have been an owner. This is an urgent problem? If some moron did something stupid or evil with a gun, that has no bearing on me and I will not be penalized for it. Punish him—severely-- and be done with it.
You should know, the California Penal Code prohibition against carrying a loaded firearm provides an exception for a temporary residence or campsite.
Finally, unless the Ranch is willing to guarantee my protection and that of my family while there—including from bears and mountain lions—where the directors know we have a recurring problem—it seems they are setting us all up for a big liability should something happen if people are forced to obey some artificial prohibition.
Don’t open this door. There is no need to. It will only cause more divisiveness and not solve a thing.
If someone is brandishing a gun, there are already laws against that. If someone is recklessly endangering someone with a gun, there are already laws against that. If someone is threatening someone with a gun, there are already laws against that.
What more does Earl want?
And one other thing—if you do pass a prohibition, I’ll ignore it and carry what I want when I want. It’s not like anyone will know for sure—just like always.
The implications--if such rules are imposed and allowed to stand--reach far beyond the borders of Ranch property. I have some ideas on where I want to take this and will post updates as they happen. In the meantime, suggestions on legal avenues to explore and cite references will be appreciated.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Declawing the Lion of the West
My first impression is the guy is too short for the role. But "Al Bouler, of Montgomery, Ala., who portrayed Davy Crockett at Davy Crockett Birthplace State Park in Limestone this past weekend...said Crockett was actually about 5 feet, 9 inches tall, his own height."
The park's official website claims that at "15 years of age [Crockett was] approaching six feet in height."
Illusions of Fess Parker and John Wayne vs. Billy Bob Thornton aside, that's really a minor debate.
What interested me was the rifles. The reneactors appear to be violating Tennessee state law:
So if the real Crockett could miraculously be transported to the present, he'd be arrested, charged with a crime and imprisoned for carrying ol' Betsy in his namesake park. Wonder what he would have thought of that?
[KABA Newslinks.]
The park's official website claims that at "15 years of age [Crockett was] approaching six feet in height."
Illusions of Fess Parker and John Wayne vs. Billy Bob Thornton aside, that's really a minor debate.
What interested me was the rifles. The reneactors appear to be violating Tennessee state law:
Are firearms allowed in state parks?
Firearms are allowed at authorized firing ranges and at parks with authorized hunts. Firearms in transit must be unloaded and cased. No other firearms are allowed.
So if the real Crockett could miraculously be transported to the present, he'd be arrested, charged with a crime and imprisoned for carrying ol' Betsy in his namesake park. Wonder what he would have thought of that?
[KABA Newslinks.]
Monday, August 22, 2005
Newspeak at It's Finest
"The first thing we had to do in the community was to empower people to say no to guns."
Wow. That's so perversely twisted it approaches elegance.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Vacation, All I Ever Wanted...
I've been on full system burn for the past 5 months, working 7 days a week at my "real" job, posting to this site, and turning in my magazine columns by deadline.
I'm taking 2 weeks off. Posting will be sporadic.
Vistors are invited to make yourselves at home. Go ahead and explore all the rooms, put your feet up on the furniture and scrounge around in the fridge. There's archives over in that column on the left, as well as links to other blogs that have the good taste and sound judgment to link back to WoG.
I'll be checking in from time to time to see if the place has burned down yet, or if anybody needs a beer or something...
I'm taking 2 weeks off. Posting will be sporadic.
Vistors are invited to make yourselves at home. Go ahead and explore all the rooms, put your feet up on the furniture and scrounge around in the fridge. There's archives over in that column on the left, as well as links to other blogs that have the good taste and sound judgment to link back to WoG.
I'll be checking in from time to time to see if the place has burned down yet, or if anybody needs a beer or something...
Brady Center: Ginning Up Jonesboro
"You kill five people in cold blood, shocking an entire nation. You go to prison. Seven years later, you get out, and you are free to buy all the guns you want."Sounds like a perfect reason to disarm you and me.
"[T]his is a textbook case of an individual who should be deemed by society as forever barred from the privilege of owning a gun."
Well, doesn't this little revelation prove the lie that they're not interested in disarming Americans--only in having "sensible gun laws"?
It ain't a "privilege."
True, it's outrageous that the "justice" system reintroduces monsters in our midst. As long as it does, expecting the rest of us to be even more defenseless is criminal and insane.
My thoughts on the effectiveness of laws that disarm segments of our non-incarcerated society--for whatever reason--can be found here.
Bottom line: Anyone who can't be trusted with a gun can't be trusted without a custodian.
Gun Law News: Request for Information - Sullivan Act
"We are beginning an investigation into the origins of and precursors to the Sullivan Act. We have a fair amount of information and the text to some New York Times editorials. What we need is more, and better sourcing for our information. We need quotes, with firm sources and, if possible PDF files. This would be especially true of any newspaper articles or editorials. If you have any information related to this, please forward it to us via Feedback."
Seems like a worthy and potentially fruitful venture.
As an aside, I have found the GLN site to be an excellent resource. RKBA activists would do well to bookmark and visit it regularly, and add it to the roll if you have a blog.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Doh!
So California state officials want the public to believe that by forcing manufacturers to install microstamping mechanisms in handguns and laser-etch serial numbers on ammunition, they'll be able to keep track of it all to solve crimes.
Why don't the dolts focus on finding the 30,000 cars they bought on the people's dime and now can't account for?
Why don't the dolts focus on finding the 30,000 cars they bought on the people's dime and now can't account for?
"Tracking down the data has been difficult... the situation 'was so bad,'...that one government agency had purchased $4 million worth of automobiles but didn't have any record of where it bought them.
"So far the department has determined that California spent $33.6 million on automobile acquisitions in calendar year 2004, but it is still compiling fleetwide data and does not yet know the total value or ongoing costs of the state's fleet."
Make of This What You Will
"Wilcox's demeanor toward authorities on the night of his arrest contributed to prosecutors' decision to drop the charges."
Random reactions:
I'm glad he's off.
I'm sorry it took a technicality to do it.
I doubt you or I would have the connections to make this work for us--or the high profile to focus a media spotlight so that the technicality couldn't be conveniently overlooked/successfully denied.
When are some of these multimillionaire celebrity gun owners--particularly ones who are minorities and could do much to sway public opinion about the right of all people to keep and bear arms--going to put their shoulder to the wheel and help promote and preserve that right?
The Government We Deserve
“At the close of the constitutional convention, a woman asked Benjamin Franklin what type of government the Constitution was bringing into existence. Franklin replied, ‘A republic, if you can keep it.’”
Flash forward:
“[O]nly 55 percent of Americans [are] able to correctly identify the three branches of government.”
"Thrilling...and Thought-Provoking"
The following review of 'The Black Arrow' appears in the current, August edition of the 'Midwest Book Review':
The Black Arrow
Vin Suprynowicz
Mountain Media
3172 North Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 343
Las Vegas, NV 89108
$24.95
www.TheLibertarian.us / www.TheBlackArrow.us
In "The Black Arrow: A Tale Of The Resistance," author Vin Suprynowicz draws upon his skill and expertise as a syndicated newspaper columnist to write a provocative novel set in the near future of 2031 where America is ruled under the authority of a Patriot-Poindexter police state. This is a time of ID checks, invasive body searches, stacked juries, kangaroo courts, a corrupt political class, and a gray-suited police cadre known as the Homeland Security Special Forces. It is against this background that wealthy record company executive Andrew Fletcher decides to resist the all powerful police state by becoming a masked vigilante known as the "Black Arrow". The result is a thrilling, rapidly paced, 703-page action/adventure novel that also incorporates thoughtful and thought-provoking commentary on the power of the state run amok, an unusual love story, and how a movement of the people can take back their liberties when pressed too far by those above them. Highly recommended reading -- especially for the libertarian inclined!
-----------------------------------------------------
Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las Vegas Review-Journal and author of the books Send in the Waco Killers, The Ballad of Carl Drega, and The Black Arrow. For information call 702-656-3285, or visit
www.TheLibertarian.us or www.LibertyBookShop.us.
Another Senseless Child Gun Death...
...that could have been prevented if only we would enact "sensible gun laws"?
Good grief, how do you reach ages 19 and 20, and not be able to tell if a revolver is loaded?
Good grief, how do you reach ages 19 and 20, and not be able to tell if a revolver is loaded?
Oh, Yeah, THIS'LL Work...
"But what I do believe that we can do is bring a concerted effort to the border so that we can capture many more guns than we have been capturing in the past that are coming in illegally."
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Coming Soon to the California Hit List: BB and Pellet Guns
From "California Dreamin'," my Rights Watch column in the Sept. 2005 issue of GUNS Magazine, on newsstands now:
You can read this bit of taxpayer-funded subversive nonsense here.
All you need to know about "study" author Max Vanzi: "Max has a bachelor’s degree in journalism from UC Berkeley."
Ditto for SOR Director Donald Moulds: "...Don was a Visiting Scholar and Teaching Fellow at Harvard University, a Ford Foundation Scholar, and a Fellow at the Center for the Study of Cultural Values and Ethics and at the Program for the Study of Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security..."
"Pellet Guns and BB Guns: Dangerous Playthings on the Open Market," by the Senate Office of Research, calls for regulating air guns with the same restrictions as firearms.
Its author is a former Los Angeles Times hack, the SOR Director is a former aide to termed out (anti-gun) Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton, and the report was prepared at the “request” of Jack Scott, another notorious gun banner.
To prove how dangerous air guns are, the report cites an instance where “[a] 16-year-old boy sustained a severe midbrain injury from a self-inflicted combination BB/pellet gun wound through the roof of his mouth.”
The “study” states “anyone can get a pellet gun with a muzzle velocity of 1,000 feet per second—more powerful than some .45 automatics.”
To back the claim that a pellet gun has “more striking power than many classes of handgun firearms,” it provides an endnote—but one that references back to the original claim, in a nice bit of circuitous deception.
You can read this bit of taxpayer-funded subversive nonsense here.
All you need to know about "study" author Max Vanzi: "Max has a bachelor’s degree in journalism from UC Berkeley."
Ditto for SOR Director Donald Moulds: "...Don was a Visiting Scholar and Teaching Fellow at Harvard University, a Ford Foundation Scholar, and a Fellow at the Center for the Study of Cultural Values and Ethics and at the Program for the Study of Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security..."
Monday, August 08, 2005
Some Choice
Westchester District Attorney Jeanine Pirro is challenging Hillary Clinton for her New York Senate seat.
"'My support in the Republican Party is broad and deep,’ Pirro told the AP when asked about a possible primary. She also said she would seek the Conservative Party's endorsement and noted that she had it for her races in Westchester County.”
“In 2006, New Yorkers will have a choice,” says the 1997 People magazine's "most beautiful people" listee.
So what kind of “choice” will a Conservative Party-endorsed candidate with “broad and deep” Republican Party support offer gun owners?
Oh, let’s just see.
She joined the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence anti-defense zealots in a Columbine High School Memorial Blood Dance to call “for renewal and strengthening of the federal assault weapons ban.”
She launched a “gun amnesty/buyback” program—“no questions asked,” naturally, “to get illegal and unwanted weapons off the streets.”
I guess gun rights aren’t important when your Republican fundraiser husband is a federal prison alumnus—as a felon, he can’t legally own a gun. Besides, when you have a taxpayer-funded bodyguard, one who made more than $87,000 in overtime in addition to his $101,000-plus salary, who need a personal gun?
The New York Republican establishment evidently believes gun owners are so cowed by the prospect of Hillary that they’ll vote for anyone.
The pathetic thing is, they’re probably right.
And don't even get me started on Rudy Giuliani.
"'My support in the Republican Party is broad and deep,’ Pirro told the AP when asked about a possible primary. She also said she would seek the Conservative Party's endorsement and noted that she had it for her races in Westchester County.”
“In 2006, New Yorkers will have a choice,” says the 1997 People magazine's "most beautiful people" listee.
So what kind of “choice” will a Conservative Party-endorsed candidate with “broad and deep” Republican Party support offer gun owners?
Oh, let’s just see.
She joined the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence anti-defense zealots in a Columbine High School Memorial Blood Dance to call “for renewal and strengthening of the federal assault weapons ban.”
She launched a “gun amnesty/buyback” program—“no questions asked,” naturally, “to get illegal and unwanted weapons off the streets.”
I guess gun rights aren’t important when your Republican fundraiser husband is a federal prison alumnus—as a felon, he can’t legally own a gun. Besides, when you have a taxpayer-funded bodyguard, one who made more than $87,000 in overtime in addition to his $101,000-plus salary, who need a personal gun?
The New York Republican establishment evidently believes gun owners are so cowed by the prospect of Hillary that they’ll vote for anyone.
The pathetic thing is, they’re probably right.
And don't even get me started on Rudy Giuliani.
Unwanted
Heartless Libertarian tells us about "the worst TV show gun-related writing ever."
In all fairness, I have not seen TNT's "Wanted," but I know from this promo blurb that I have no desire to:
Couldn't be any Hollywood liberal bias in that assumption, could there?
As if a true conservative, i.e., original intent Constitutionalist, would have anything to do with BATFU.
In all fairness, I have not seen TNT's "Wanted," but I know from this promo blurb that I have no desire to:
"Jimmy McGloin (Hurst) is an ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) officer and a bona fide card-carrying conservative."
Couldn't be any Hollywood liberal bias in that assumption, could there?
As if a true conservative, i.e., original intent Constitutionalist, would have anything to do with BATFU.
Front Sight:True Crimes--Casting Final Episodes
I'm passing this along at the request of Deborah Courtney:
Victim Rights Advocate and Second Amendment Activist, Deborah Courtney, is actively seeking those who have been brutally victimized by crime from across the country to tell their story in an upcoming TV reality documentary. She will help those who participate in taking control back into their lives through personal safety awareness and personal defense as part of the show.
She believes in total empowerment of those victimized!
Contact her at the following email before August 25
Deborah Ann Courtney
www.NOVICTIMS.org
Friday, August 05, 2005
Just Do It
I just sent my review of Matthew Bracken's "Enemies Foreign and Domestic" in to GUNS Magazine. As it will be a few months before that issue hits the stands, let me give a brief teaser/spoiler here:
Buy this book. Stop what you're doing, go the the website I've linked to and just do it.
The Courtesy of a Reply Would be Appreciated
Dear Mr. DiMare,
I hope all is well with you. I haven’t received a reply to my open letter yet, and under normal circumstances, you’ve certainly had plenty of time to give me one.
Has anything changed? Are you still the staff contact for the California Chamber of Commerce for “job killer” bills? Should I be writing someone else?
Please let me know. I don’t want people to think the Chamber would duck this important issue out of political correctness or fear of taking a stand related to guns, but without any feedback from you it’s tough not to speculate.
Are SB352 and AB357 not “job killers” too?
Is the Chamber intentionally ignoring my letter?
Are firearm and ammunition makers not part of the California economy, producing legal products enjoyed by millions of consumers? Are the thousands of direct and ancillary support jobs these industries create not worthy of the Chamber’s concern and support?
Will the Chamber issue a statement on these "job killer" bills or intentionally remain silent?
Sincerely,
David Codrea
The War on Guns
I hope all is well with you. I haven’t received a reply to my open letter yet, and under normal circumstances, you’ve certainly had plenty of time to give me one.
Has anything changed? Are you still the staff contact for the California Chamber of Commerce for “job killer” bills? Should I be writing someone else?
Please let me know. I don’t want people to think the Chamber would duck this important issue out of political correctness or fear of taking a stand related to guns, but without any feedback from you it’s tough not to speculate.
Are SB352 and AB357 not “job killers” too?
Is the Chamber intentionally ignoring my letter?
Are firearm and ammunition makers not part of the California economy, producing legal products enjoyed by millions of consumers? Are the thousands of direct and ancillary support jobs these industries create not worthy of the Chamber’s concern and support?
Will the Chamber issue a statement on these "job killer" bills or intentionally remain silent?
Sincerely,
David Codrea
The War on Guns
Gun Law News Disagrees With JPFO
Looks like we're gonna have us a debate.
Nice to be a spectator for a change.
Nice to be a spectator for a change.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
JPFO ALERT: Is S. 397 a Trojan Horse?
When JPFO talks, gun owners should listen.
In this case their fears, that S. 397 could result in giving the AG power to ban all rifle ammo capable of penetrating BODY ARMOR, should be looked at very carefully--particularly since this opinion is being given serious credence by Len Savage.
I haven't had time to look into this, so am posting this in the hopes of soliciting informed opinions. Is there an alternative explanation? If JPFO's analysis is accurate, why haven't we heard about this from NRA?
In this case their fears, that S. 397 could result in giving the AG power to ban all rifle ammo capable of penetrating BODY ARMOR, should be looked at very carefully--particularly since this opinion is being given serious credence by Len Savage.
I haven't had time to look into this, so am posting this in the hopes of soliciting informed opinions. Is there an alternative explanation? If JPFO's analysis is accurate, why haven't we heard about this from NRA?
QUICK! TAKE THIS POLL!!!
Do you support the National Rifle Association's boycott of ConocoPhillips?
So far, "No" is leading. Click on the link and vote to help change that, and pass this on to your gun owner friends.
On AHSA
Bloggers are all over the American Hunters and Shooters Association. Aside from posting a few comments on other blogs and pointing out their connections with Crime Gun Solutions, I haven't said much, because I already said it this weekend--in my latest submission to GUNS Magazine.
I owe it to the publisher not to offer essentially the same commentary on my blog that I'm asking them to send me a check for. But it's frustrating to know that by the time my article comes out, much of the same ground will have been covered on the internet for months.
A lot of great research has been independently conducted on this--I don't want to slight anybody else who's commented, but Triggerfinger and Gun Law News offer some of the best analyses.
The source I need to credit for making me aware of AHSA is NRA's Dawson at "Digger's Corner." That's what prompted me to start "digging," which included much of the same methodology used by others--the Whois lookup, finding the DCS connection, etc.
I would like to offer one insight about a front group inserting themselves into the shooting community as if they're on our side, something I like to think of as The AHSA Motto.
I owe it to the publisher not to offer essentially the same commentary on my blog that I'm asking them to send me a check for. But it's frustrating to know that by the time my article comes out, much of the same ground will have been covered on the internet for months.
A lot of great research has been independently conducted on this--I don't want to slight anybody else who's commented, but Triggerfinger and Gun Law News offer some of the best analyses.
The source I need to credit for making me aware of AHSA is NRA's Dawson at "Digger's Corner." That's what prompted me to start "digging," which included much of the same methodology used by others--the Whois lookup, finding the DCS connection, etc.
I would like to offer one insight about a front group inserting themselves into the shooting community as if they're on our side, something I like to think of as The AHSA Motto.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
No Apologies
Drudge titled his link to this story: "EDITOR: NO APOLOGIES FOR HELEN THOMAS 'KILL SELF' REPORT..."
I think the guy does owe us an apology...for getting our hopes up.
I think the guy does owe us an apology...for getting our hopes up.
Wrong John Silver's
[Use BugMeNot UserID: none@homee.com / Password: 66666 to bypass site registration]
Rick Stanley reminds me of this story from Oct. 2004. I think it merits being brought up again.
Robbers come into a Long John Silver's restaurant. They order three employees on the floor. They order the supervisor to the back of the store. He thinks he's a dead man and hits one of the robbers with a hammer, thwarting the robbery and causing them to flee.
Long John Silver's fires him for not following company policy. The company flack, an idiot and a weasel, claims their policy outlines the steps he should have taken.
I've written company policies--2 years in pharmaceutical production, 16 years in defense electronics and 3 years in medical practice management--three more heavily regulated and audited industries you will not find--and I helped get my companies through audits conducted by the best (worst) the feds and state could throw at us. There are very few areas where I would have the gall to claim to be qualified to be considered an expert in. This is one of those areas.
Any claim that Long John Silver's has a policy that can effectively deal with an armed robbery is bullshit. It is a lie. Anyone claiming otherwise is either incompetent or a lying corporate whore who will say anything to please his masters.
Sue me, Rick Maynard.
My one and only experience with this pathetic chain went down like this: The kids saw a commercial for popcorn shrimp or some such and wanted to try it. We have one not too far from home and had never been to it, so I took the family there for lunch.
The place was empty as far as customers were concerned, but the counter help was busy chatting with the kitchen help, and decided continuing the conversation was a biggger priority than attending to patrons with money to spend. After about 3 minutes, she finally noticed us and acknowledged our presence. She also wiped her eye with her index finger and looked at the results this yielded.
Sue me, Long John Silver's. I'd swear to that in court and have 3 witnesses who would back me up.
Needless to say, I shepherded the wife and kids out of that disgusting place pronto, and we have never been back.
Long story short: Boycott these creeps.
Rick Stanley reminds me of this story from Oct. 2004. I think it merits being brought up again.
Robbers come into a Long John Silver's restaurant. They order three employees on the floor. They order the supervisor to the back of the store. He thinks he's a dead man and hits one of the robbers with a hammer, thwarting the robbery and causing them to flee.
Long John Silver's fires him for not following company policy. The company flack, an idiot and a weasel, claims their policy outlines the steps he should have taken.
I've written company policies--2 years in pharmaceutical production, 16 years in defense electronics and 3 years in medical practice management--three more heavily regulated and audited industries you will not find--and I helped get my companies through audits conducted by the best (worst) the feds and state could throw at us. There are very few areas where I would have the gall to claim to be qualified to be considered an expert in. This is one of those areas.
Any claim that Long John Silver's has a policy that can effectively deal with an armed robbery is bullshit. It is a lie. Anyone claiming otherwise is either incompetent or a lying corporate whore who will say anything to please his masters.
Sue me, Rick Maynard.
My one and only experience with this pathetic chain went down like this: The kids saw a commercial for popcorn shrimp or some such and wanted to try it. We have one not too far from home and had never been to it, so I took the family there for lunch.
The place was empty as far as customers were concerned, but the counter help was busy chatting with the kitchen help, and decided continuing the conversation was a biggger priority than attending to patrons with money to spend. After about 3 minutes, she finally noticed us and acknowledged our presence. She also wiped her eye with her index finger and looked at the results this yielded.
Sue me, Long John Silver's. I'd swear to that in court and have 3 witnesses who would back me up.
Needless to say, I shepherded the wife and kids out of that disgusting place pronto, and we have never been back.
Long story short: Boycott these creeps.
"Security Guards in California Are Going to be Trained to Help Fight Terrorists."
The reporterette on KFI radio actually said that as the lead-in to a news story.
I laughed so hard and so long my ribs hurt. Other drivers on the 91 Freeway must have thought I was nuts.
Our tax dollars at work.
Good Lord, we are so doomed.
I laughed so hard and so long my ribs hurt. Other drivers on the 91 Freeway must have thought I was nuts.
Our tax dollars at work.
Good Lord, we are so doomed.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Shameless Plug: California Dreamin'
It’s not about public safety—it’s about harassing gun owners and political opponents. That’s why we see endless proposals designed to infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms—something Attorney General Bill Lockyer denies exists.
California Dreamin’ is my “Rights Watch” column for the September issue of GUNS Magazine, available now at visionary newsstands throughout the Republic.
The issue also features my review of Vin Suprynowicz’s futurist liberty novel “The Black Arrow.”
Look Who’s Demanding Gun Control
Guess who thinks YOU can't be trusted to own and use firearms responsibly.
My August "Rights Watch" column for GUNS Magazine is now online.
My August "Rights Watch" column for GUNS Magazine is now online.
"What's Wrong With Gun Laws?"
The August 1955 issue of GUNS Magazine is now online. A Chicago cop, of all people, makes a statement against gun control--and you'll recognize many of the same arguments used today. The photos of New York and Chicago cops dumping confiscated firearms into the water should interest gun control historians.
Also in this issue:
"Why Cops Get Killed"
"How Dick Tracy Gets His Man"
"The 20,000 Guns of Jesse James"
and more.
And There Was War in the Heavens...
Some folks are taking me to task for yesterday's post.
In a nutshell: No, I am not "for" private employers banning guns, searching cars for them or firing employees who have them in their car trunks. I'd like to see company policies welcoming employees to carry on premises.
What concerns me is the method for achieving this--and whether the chair we pick up in this particular barfight is also used to smash rights to property and freedom of association. I see grave danger in ceding more power to government in these areas.
Under my argument, if you don't bend to my will, the worst that can happen is that our association is terminated. By entering government into the mix, the element of coercion is also introduced. Now, if I don't bend to your will, you can call in the JBTs to seize me and my property, and to destroy me if I resist.
That does not seem to me to be a formula for freedom.
But that doesn't mean we're powerless to retaliate against private parties that have anti-gun policies. Companies generally have a comparatively small profit margin--the difference of a percentage point or two can make a difference between thriving or succumbing, especially when they face a lot of competition.
That's why, while I fully support NRA's call to boycott ConocoPhillips. And while there are other companies that also deserve this response, I think it's smart strategy to focus on only one to make an example out of for the rest.
I challenge you who feel strongly about this to contact ConocoPhillips management. I'm not going to give an email address, because that's too easy to do--it will make more of an impression to contact them directly, either by mail or phone:
Contact them today. And do it once a week until this is over. If you have one of their gas cards, cut it up and return it with a note telling them why. Make good on the boycott--refuse to buy their products. And spread the word--get your gun owner friends involved.
In a nutshell: No, I am not "for" private employers banning guns, searching cars for them or firing employees who have them in their car trunks. I'd like to see company policies welcoming employees to carry on premises.
What concerns me is the method for achieving this--and whether the chair we pick up in this particular barfight is also used to smash rights to property and freedom of association. I see grave danger in ceding more power to government in these areas.
Under my argument, if you don't bend to my will, the worst that can happen is that our association is terminated. By entering government into the mix, the element of coercion is also introduced. Now, if I don't bend to your will, you can call in the JBTs to seize me and my property, and to destroy me if I resist.
That does not seem to me to be a formula for freedom.
But that doesn't mean we're powerless to retaliate against private parties that have anti-gun policies. Companies generally have a comparatively small profit margin--the difference of a percentage point or two can make a difference between thriving or succumbing, especially when they face a lot of competition.
That's why, while I fully support NRA's call to boycott ConocoPhillips. And while there are other companies that also deserve this response, I think it's smart strategy to focus on only one to make an example out of for the rest.
I challenge you who feel strongly about this to contact ConocoPhillips management. I'm not going to give an email address, because that's too easy to do--it will make more of an impression to contact them directly, either by mail or phone:
600 North Dairy Ashford (77079-1175)
P.O. Box 2197
Houston, TX 77252-2197
Phone 281.293.1000
Contact them today. And do it once a week until this is over. If you have one of their gas cards, cut it up and return it with a note telling them why. Make good on the boycott--refuse to buy their products. And spread the word--get your gun owner friends involved.
Monday, August 01, 2005
DeWine Whines
"In a lengthy speech on the Senate floor, the former Greene County prosecutor lashed out at the bill, which would require gun victims to prove that a crime had been committed before they could bring a civil lawsuit against the firearms industry." [More]
We can't have that, can we? No, we want to sue people who have complied with all the state and federal laws.
I'm originally from Ohio. If I still lived there, I'd be doing my best to put this fascist out to pasture--even if it meant letting a Sara Brady democrat win for a cycle. There is no other way to teach Ohio republicans the lesson that a choice unacceptable to gun owners will always lose.
I wish there was a way to convince all republicans of the same. Some of us do what we can, but fear of democrats seems to cow most people into settling for a perceived lesser evil.
Until we change that, nothing else will change. It doesn't have to.
Just What We Need:
NRA stumping for edicts to tell people what they can and cannot do with their private property. [More]
As loathsome as it might be, if I own a piece of property and you want to access it, and as long as I'm not forcing you to do so, I have a right to set the rules. You then have the right to tell me where to stick those rules, bypass me and mine in your commercial dealings, and rally people of like mind to do the same.
You do NOT have the right to impose your rules on my property under force of government arms.
The proper response to corporate anti-gun policies is exposure and consumer activism. I fear the use of state-enforced coercion over private property decisions provides too much potential to blow up in our faces, what with precedent and legal penumbras and all.
As loathsome as it might be, if I own a piece of property and you want to access it, and as long as I'm not forcing you to do so, I have a right to set the rules. You then have the right to tell me where to stick those rules, bypass me and mine in your commercial dealings, and rally people of like mind to do the same.
You do NOT have the right to impose your rules on my property under force of government arms.
The proper response to corporate anti-gun policies is exposure and consumer activism. I fear the use of state-enforced coercion over private property decisions provides too much potential to blow up in our faces, what with precedent and legal penumbras and all.