Anybody seen the text of the complaint or the ruling?
I keep seeing it billed as a "Second Amendment victory."
Anybody know if the Second Amendment is even mentioned?
Be nice to get another individual rights ruling. Did we?
Saturday, September 24, 2005
Turns Out What Yale Women Want...
...is a man.
Sorry, Jeff Mankoff.
Although editorialist Karen Stabiner might make a good match for you--that is, if she can ever stop seething with resentment against women who choose to be nurturing wives and mothers instead of indignant leftist harridans.
Whatever happened to a woman's right to choose? Or tolerance? Or diversity?
The truth is, and Stabiner's bitter words prove it, any deviation from the radical feminist agenda is viewed as a personal affront. Women are to be celebrated for their minds--paradoxically unless and until they disagree with the zealot orthodoxy, at which point they become deluded victims of patriarchal exploitation.
It's the same reason the left hates gun ownership: We've worked so hard to create a nanny state. How dare you ingrates reject it and pursue selfish individualism?
It's heartening to see this--perhaps the movement to suppress individuality will prove as effective as other efforts of the collective. Perhaps a critical mass of free-thinking individuals will always slip through the cracks--just enough to keep the embers of freedom glowing. That means there's still a chance for a genuine blaze to break out, maybe some day a genuine bonfire.
But for the short terms, it's nice to see a good portion of Yale women deciding that what they want is a man. I hope they also realize that real men don't need nannies.
Sorry, Jeff Mankoff.
Although editorialist Karen Stabiner might make a good match for you--that is, if she can ever stop seething with resentment against women who choose to be nurturing wives and mothers instead of indignant leftist harridans.
Whatever happened to a woman's right to choose? Or tolerance? Or diversity?
The truth is, and Stabiner's bitter words prove it, any deviation from the radical feminist agenda is viewed as a personal affront. Women are to be celebrated for their minds--paradoxically unless and until they disagree with the zealot orthodoxy, at which point they become deluded victims of patriarchal exploitation.
It's the same reason the left hates gun ownership: We've worked so hard to create a nanny state. How dare you ingrates reject it and pursue selfish individualism?
It's heartening to see this--perhaps the movement to suppress individuality will prove as effective as other efforts of the collective. Perhaps a critical mass of free-thinking individuals will always slip through the cracks--just enough to keep the embers of freedom glowing. That means there's still a chance for a genuine blaze to break out, maybe some day a genuine bonfire.
But for the short terms, it's nice to see a good portion of Yale women deciding that what they want is a man. I hope they also realize that real men don't need nannies.
The Responsibilities of Gun Ownership
Sailor Curt thinks one of them is activism. He just added a detailed comment to my original Handgun Club of America article that I think bears special consideration.
Incidentally, he has his own blog, Captain of a Crew of One (I'm the Captain of my ship, but I'm the only crew. All hands on deck!), recently added to the WoG blogroll.
Incidentally, he has his own blog, Captain of a Crew of One (I'm the Captain of my ship, but I'm the only crew. All hands on deck!), recently added to the WoG blogroll.
Help Cure Hoplophobia
Another ally of those who fear armed citizens:
So he plowed his car into them.
Thank goodness he was licensed and his deadly assault weapon was registered.
Wonder if the Million Moms will give him an Apple Pie Award?
Stephen M. Ressa, 27, also told police he saw people with their hands in their pockets and thought they might be armed with guns...
So he plowed his car into them.
Thank goodness he was licensed and his deadly assault weapon was registered.
Wonder if the Million Moms will give him an Apple Pie Award?