That anyone could base such an assertion on his own interpretation and not on the writings of the people who conceived and wrote the Second Amendment is beyond astonishing--and sounds like an artifice of falsity.
Dennis Hannick fires back at a fictional interpretation of the Second Amendment.
It looks like the paper appreciated the holes he shot in the collective rights argument, as well.
That has been THE most commented on article I've ever seen. People are blasting Miller from EVERY angle. Poor, poor Mr. Miller! Bet you he's looking for a place to hide!
ReplyDelete