Saturday, August 05, 2006

We're the Only Ones Exonerated Enough

A police marksman who wounded a suspect during an anti-terror raid stumbled during the operation and accidentally fired his gun, the police complaints bureau ruled Thursday, exonerating the officer of any wrongdoing.
Safety off. Finger on the trigger. Shoots a non-"Only One".

Yep.
"In the circumstances, I conclude that the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offense."
Sounds about right to me. Who except a non-"Only One" could possibly conclude otherwise? And they don't matter.

And note we know the name of the "suspect," Mohammed Abdul Kahar, and even how old he is, "23."

Quick--what's the name of the "police marksman", I mean "the officer"?

Thanks, Watchdog Press! That must be why you're "authorized journalists" and we're not!

[Thanks to K Romulus]

1 comment:

  1. "In the circumstances, I conclude that the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offense."


    That is the reason for the second amendment. So that we may disabuse ourselves of a self-anointed aristocracy.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.