Amazing. These people don't even know what it is they want to ban. And she's their "leader." What an incompetent fraud. In any other professional field, this would be considered malpractice.
From your legislation, Congressthing McCarthy, which you apparently neither read nor understood, but insisted on banning anyway:
`(36) Barrel Shroud- The term `barrel shroud' means a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel of a firearm so that the shroud protects the user of the firearm from heat generated by the barrel, but does not include a slide that encloses the barrel, and does not include an extension of the stock along the bottom of the barrel which does not encircle or substantially encircle the barrel.[Via "Anonymous"]
here is the text of my email to my Representative in Arkansas' fourth congressional district, Mike Ross.
ReplyDeleteI urge everyone to send something similar to theirs. My Senators will be the next recipients.
*********************************
Do not support any gun control initiatives because of this monstrous event.
Do not publicly sympathize with the families of the victims or the victims if you are not prepared to correct the conditions that made this incident inevitable.
There were and are students of Va. Tech who had a license to carry concealed, Va. also is an open carry state. Yet this monster was the most powerful person everywhere he walked because school policy made him so. School policy required all students who were not willing to risk expulsion to be unarmed and helpless in the face of such assault. They were.
School policy enabled this monster to kill more than 30 people and wound as many more. School policy, not even state law, not even federal law, mandated that every student, but the killer, be murder victims.
Va. Tech requires helplessness of its students, it is required for their safety? Well that worked out well didn't it?
If you truly do find this act reprehensible you will work to remove the impediments of defense of self and others and the impediments of access and bearing of the tools of that defense.
I say to all who will not do such that they are pleased with what happened 16 Apr 07, despite their protestation to the contrary. Don't give me any more damn words. Do the right thing. Remove the impediments to the observation and practice of the second amendment. We have enough proof that helplessness is not a security measure.
All who call for stricter security measures at the expense of liberty and/or call for more gun control are not honest brokers for the American people. They are profiteers. Profiteers who cannot profit from a self-reliant populace. It is time to stop the madness and quit prohibiting the tools of defense to the good people.
Mad as all Hell
(my signature)
That was outstanding!
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if that reporter was pro or anti, and really that is how it should be. In that albeit brief clip, he did not insert his own bias.
He asked a perfectly legitimate question. She proposes banning something by name and does not know what that name means.
That is the type of ignorance the press should be able to expose. Good reporting in my book.
Tucker Carlson may not be able to dance, but he knows how to conduct an interview. Good on him.
ReplyDeleteSo .... McCarthy wants to ban a safety feature ...
ReplyDeleteSo does everyone who wants to ban pistol grips, Kristopher--for the benefit of those who might be new to this topic, their main function is to facilitate a better grip, providing stability, which improves control during firing. A firm grip keeps the barrel steadier during quick fire, allowing for more accurate shot placement. Such a grip also allows for one-handed emergency operation--you might be dialing 911, or trying to pull someone out of harm's way, or opening a door, or your fore-grip arm may have become incapacitated, or...
ReplyDeleteSo by banning them, the antis evidently feel everyone would be safer if the shooter has less control over shot placement, less safety for himself and others, and more for his assailant.
Welcome to the Bizarro world of "common sense gun safety" as envisioned by those with the absolutley no qualifications to even have an opinion on the matter, much less be brainwashing their constituents and passing binding laws.
This video is shocking not for the obvious ignorance that you gents are quick to observe.
ReplyDeleteWhat is shocking is the way Rep. McCarthy has been used as the gun-control advocate.
The people who convinced her in Congress to represent the anti-gun agenda used both her incredibly traumatic personal experience (murdered husband, wounded son) as well as her ignorance (im trying to avoid the word stupidity).
Now what occured to me is that this is exactly what pimps do.
Does she realize who THEY think she is? They used her like a w...
Well done Tucker Carlson. Now why can't we see more of this type of reporting?
ReplyDeletethe sad thing is that people will go along with this crap and they don't know either. And do they think that gun owners are going to obey that kind of law. I will the police will protect me NOT!
ReplyDeletethats very good man great video keep up the good work
ReplyDeletecomon does she really think makin these illegal will stop gansters from usin them
ReplyDeleteIt is utterly ridiculous and embarrassing to try to ban an item without even knowing what that item is.
ReplyDelete