One might think that the only thing people would be interested in hearing from "Father" Michael Pfleger is a retraction of, and an apology and explanation for, his call to "snuff out" gun shop owner John Riggio, along with unnamed pro-rights legislators. One would, apparently, be wrong. Next Wednesday, he'll be on TV, as part of a panel, in a bit of irony too bizarre for decent fiction, on reducing youth violence in Chicago.
I suspect this panel--government coercion proponents all-- couldn't find a solution with both hands and a mirror, but that won't stop ABC7 from passing them off as the best and brightest in the field.
I contacted the station via their online form:
Here's the complete text of my message:
How can you people even feign objectivity with the panel of citizen disarmament zealots you have assembled? How do you have the absolute gall to present this under auspices of "news," as opposed to agenda-driven statist propaganda? And who will violence-stopping Mike Pfleger recommend snuffing out this time? You want real news, try asking him how he operates a tax-deductible 501 (c)(3) while engaging in legislative advocacy. But that would require two things you obviously don't possess based on the insultingly biased composition of your panel of "experts": objectivity and an interest in the truth.
If you agree that ABC7 is engaging in propaganda vs news, please go to their comments page and protest their selection of panelists. Why is it they can't seem to find even one participant who can demonstrate the only solution to preventing violence is if potential victims have the means to discourage it?
Please do this, spread the word, and encourage others to follow suit. It would be nice if fellow gun bloggers and pro-2A forums joined in too.
I got a reply (of sorts):
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing your views. Your email has been forwarded to our
producers for consideration.
Embarrassingly enough, I (for some reason) had the impression that their contact form worked like the comment sections for blogs, so I was carefully using HTML tags--which didn't come through, and made me look like an even bigger doofus (if that can be imagined) than I am. oh well, I'm not sure it would have made much difference.
I protested via the online form as well, even identifying myself as someone who wasn't a gun owner. This is something over which everyone should be outraged.
ReplyDelete