"All of these facts undermine Respondent's claim that Petitioner was out to 'intimidate and harass' the inspectors," the filing said. "It is equally as likely that Respondents decided to exaggerate innocuous circumstances to justify terminating an inspection that was not finding any regulatory violations or breaches of the Court's order."
Yeah, that and lie.
[More about Red's Trading Post from WarOnGuns]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.