As many as six people are dead in a shooting rampage in Crandon, Wisconsin. The suspect is reportedly with the Forest County Sheriff's Department. At last report authorities were still trying to hunt him down.
They'd better, because
"ordinary citizens" will be sitting ducks until they do:
It is now 2007, and Wisconsin is one of only two states that completely prohibits anyone but police officers and sheriffs' deputies from carrying concealed weapons for self defense.
Well, yeah. That's 'cause they're "
The Only Ones"...
Couldn't help but notice that at least one "authorized journalist" referred to the murderer as a "law enforcement employee" instead of a "law enforcement officer."
ReplyDeleteThe Canadian press has a caption that refers to the murderer as a "Law Enforcement Worker."
What a freakin crock. The spin has already begun.
He'll probably be referred to later as a "distraught lover employed as a peacekeeper, who was denied the proper treatment due someone of his caliber.
OOPS! Sorry 'bout that....
Quick...
ReplyDeletePass gun-control so this never happens again.
Only police should...oh, wait.
C.H.
Perhaps, since the subjects of Wisconsin aren't allowed to have guns, nor should the Only Ones. Seeing the only ones are just as dangerous with a gun, as the libtards believe law abiding citizens would be.
ReplyDeleteWell if the law enforcement officers are the only one carrying guns then the guns should be illegal for EVERYONE to be in possesion of because we are all given the same rights by our constitution. Futhermore the fire arm isn't the only way the law enforcement community has to employ they also have non lethal means (i.e. Bean bag launchers and electrical firing shock units called "Tazzers" the people in these Firearm Prohibited states should make that their next law to pass effective immediately the longer they wait the more lives lost
ReplyDeleteTwo observations; I am surprised he was shot by cops. Usually they get a paid vacation and a whitewash.
ReplyDeleteTwo, "The whole neighborhood was still on lockdown Sunday. "Nobody expected anything like this," Vollmar said. "I guess nobody anywhere ever does."
By what right or authority do the police "lockdown" an entire neighborhood?
This tragedy was no doubt due to the wide availability of handguns. Oh wait...
ReplyDeleteIndubitably, this is the most devastating example of the "Only Ones" I have ever seen!
ReplyDeleteNow I'm all confused--if Tyler Peterson (the murderous "Only One") owned or carried a semi-automatic, detachable magazine fed rifle, would it be an "assault weapon," or a "patrol rifle"?
ReplyDeleteThe only reason the city was locked down is because tyler was on the run and considered armed and dangerous still. I dont get people like you. Passing judgements and making assumptions on all of this. I live about ten miles from there and it was for our safety, dont turn it around on the cops saying they dont have the right. You dont know what is going on, only what you hear on the news. so before you any pass anymore judgements or make assumptions. you should know details and kind of have an idea of how messed up he was. to kill that many kids the way he did. is just sickening. so i could see why police put the town on a lockdown while he was on the loose and running.
ReplyDeleteAnon wrote:
ReplyDelete"you should know details and kind of have an idea of how messed up he was."
The irony that straightarrow witnessed apparently escaped anonymous:
An "only one," whom anon apparently has "an idea how messed up he was," kills a bunch of folks with a gun, and "the only ones" lock down the neighborhood.
Perhaps it would be better if the citizens could protect themselves from "messed up only ones" with the same tools that the only ones use.
"I dont get people like you. "- anon
ReplyDeleteThank you. I consider that a fine compliment.May your chains rest lightly upon you as you live in puzzlement of the workings of the minds of free men.
Well said Straightarrow.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, Patrick Lynch must be in a quandary. After all, it was an "only one" that lifted a finger against an "only one." What if a "non-only one" had dared to lift a finger against this particular "only one" in order to stop him? Would this still apply? : "We need to make it clear that if someone lifts even a finger against a police officer, their life could be on the line." I wonder if that "sniper's" life is on the line?
I just read an updated article from the AP on this shooting. Why the crap is it a rifle, an AR-15 or a gun when a cop is the user but it's an 'assault weapon' when a citizen even just so much as owns an AR-15? It is either an AR-15/rifle/gun ALL the time or it's an assault weapon ALL the time. Jerk-wad idiots!
ReplyDeleteSam
What in the world is a town of 2,000 doing with a SWAT team? According to the Daily Mail article this little community has a "heavily armed" SWAT Team.
ReplyDeleteI think this community needs to take after some other parts of this country and have "heavily armed" citizens. Then this kind of thing would be far less likely to happen.
BTW, it adds additional evidence to the incriminating pile that a goodly number of Only Ones become just that because it grants them "power" over others.