Lawbreakers protesting a lawful establishment--and getting away with it.
I guess if you're Snuffy Pfleger, doing the mayor's work if not the Lord's, you can. Funny--I wonder if he'd be as supportive of gun owners deciding which laws they want to publicly flout? [Insert Borat "Not!"]
I read another account that prominently featured a Virginia Tech "survivor" (i.e., lottery winner). This pathetic creature was helpless to protect himself and useless to those being murdered around him, yet is out there protesting that the rest of us should be rendered equally contemptible--under force of arms, of course.
[Via Vinnie]
Traumatic events bring out the true character (or lack thereof) in the people who survive them. This VT "survivor" has shown himself to be a willing slave.
ReplyDeleteI obviously have no respect for "Snuffy," and it's hard to miss the hypocrisy of breaking the law in one's advocacy of . . . more laws.
ReplyDeleteStill, I can't really get behind the idea of requiring a permit (and fees) to mount a protest (even such a monumentally misguided one as Snuffy's).
In principle, I agree, 45--however, if we did it, I expect we'd be arrested and charged, and if the politically powerful and connected get to decide which laws from the menu they wish to ignore--and we cannot--that is, in essence, royalty.
ReplyDeleteI can also see how certain events--a rally on a mall, a parade, etc., require community resources to be expended, via traffic control, etc., and don't particularly want plunder taken from me to be used to fund the Nazi Coprophiliac Pederasts for Satan are People Too rally
Both good points, David.
ReplyDeleteHow dare they refuse to relinquish their first amendment by paying to exercise them, while they campaign against another's second amendment rights?
ReplyDeleteYou know, those rights that protect theirs. Not to mention their breech of the peace in order to unlawfully restrict the economic activity of a man in full compliance with the law and selling legal products and services.
Oh, yeah. I forgot. They're hypocrites. Hypocrites of the worst kind. They not only refuse any responsibility for themselves, but demand others do also.
If they exercised any responsibility for the rights they haven't earned, nor protected and in fact, try to destroy they would be too damn busy working and raising their children to behave responsibly. But no, that is not what we see here.
What we see here are welfare layabouts with no parental instincts nor parental intents blaming others for their own shortcomings, and the shortcomings of their murderous children.
Millions of Americans died to end slavery for no apparently good reason it seems. Since the descendants of those slaves insist, nay, demand its reinstitution.
How much more of a waste of biological material could there be?