The Maryland State Police classified 53 nonviolent activists as terrorists and entered their names and personal information into state and federal databases that track terrorism suspects, the state police chief acknowledged yesterday.I wonder what list you and I are on, fellow activist gun owners...but that's not the main thing that sticks out in this admission.
Check it out: the state admits it knows these activists to be nonviolent.
What better persons to have shrieking Paul Helmke demanding be disarmed?
[Via Plug Nickel Times]
Liberal activists are violent and have known to do millions of dollars in damage. The burn car dealership that sell SUV's and pick up trucks. The attack research labs and kill the white mice. The burn down building projects just before families can move into them. They attack chicken and egg farms. They spike trees to kill and injury the workers in mills. And like Oboma's buddy they bomb buildings killing people. The list of violence of the liberal peace activists are a very long list.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, gun owners whom are Second Amendment activists are by far very lawful citizens and will make very sure they follow the laws of the land to make sure they don't do anything that could cost them their Constitutional rights.
The bottom line is being a liberal is a very clear sign of mental illness. Being a redneck is a clear sign of a lawful citizen and proud of it.
avgjoe - it's always those liberal activists... Like those liberals who beat Matthew Shepard to death, like the b**tards who took Lorca out of his home at night and shot him, like the idiots who dragged that black man behind a truck in Texas and left him to die on the road, like Timothy McVeigh, like people who shoot doctors who provide abortions, like Pinochet... And on.
ReplyDeleteHumans - particularly those risen to some level of power over others - "are violent and have known to do millions of dollars in damage".
As to these "constitutional rights" that are so fragile that they can just be "cost" me - that's not something I base my deeds or thoughts on. You speak as though people live at the behest of others who can rescind these 'rights' if one's not 'lawful' - whatever that might be at any given moment.
I will put it to you straight - avgjoe - what you say sounds a lot like how the "Only Ones" who added those names to that Fedgov watchlist think.
Were you just being sarcastic?