Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Guest Editorial: HR 45, the Assault Weapons Ban, and the Hegelian Dialectic

by Dominus Defensor

The Obama administration wants to craft a new assault weapon ban and make it permanent, and it wants to end the private sale of all firearms, among other things. This announcement from the potential attorney general is one of the most important events for the gun rights community in a long time. This is the first public expression of Obama's plans by an identifiable individual within the Obama administration.

At the 1-16-2009 Senate Judiciary Hearings Eric Holder said the following: "I also think that making the assault weapons ban permanent would be something that would be permitted under Heller, and I also think [it] would be good...."

The announcement by Holder is likely the real plan of the administration. The previously announced HR45 is likely a diversion as part of the implementation and execution of the Hegelian Dialectic. HR45, as recently discussed at WOG and at examiner.com outlines the draconian plans to require licenses to own firearms, the passing of a written exam, government access to your private medical records, and a central registry of all gun owners, etc. All of this just for the exercise of a fundamental human right.

HR45 is probably not their real agenda for the moment (not that they would be upset if they did achieve it). It was announced with perfect timing right before the Holder confirmation hearings. The drafting and announcement of HR45 was likely designed to achieve the following goals:

1. Execution of the Hegelian Dialectic. They intentionally create a sense of panic with the proposed draconian legislation (HR45) that the boot is about to stomp our heads. Then, when they subsequently release their slightly less draconian plans at the confirmation hearings for Holder (assault weapon ban, end all private transfers of guns, etc.), we breathe a sigh of relief that things are not as bad as we thought and voluntarily accept lesser infringements. (NOTE: it could be argued that the real plan is just the opposite in that HR45 is the goal and not another assault weapon ban. Either way, their ultimate goal is to deny us our fundamental human right to keep and bear arms, and the main thing for us is to understand the tactics behind their actions.)

We must counter this by knowing the nature and origin of our rights and refusing to surrender them in the most loud and raucous way possible. Never voluntarily surrender any rights. We must reinforce the idea that attempting to take these rights will come at a great cost for the enemy because we will never voluntarily submit to their abuses or their tricks.

Summary of the Hegelian Dialectic:

This has been explained before, but here is another summary.

The basic premise of the Hegelian Dialectic is to incrementally move in the desired direction to the detriment of a group of people with the voluntary consent of the aggrieved people. This is done through fear and release. First, a terrifying plan is leaked out that would mean catastrophe or a gross violation of the target people's rights. Then, a less extreme plan is proposed as a compromise to the more extreme plan. This makes the target feel relieved that things will not be as bad as originally thought, creating a sense of release, and the target voluntarily chooses to submit to the less extreme plan under the false hope that the bad guys will be satiated and under the false belief that a crisis has been averted by choosing the lesser of two evils. The bad guys are NEVER satiated, and they will be back for more in the future. In addition, choosing the lesser of two evils as dictated by the bad guys is never the solution. We must dictate our own solutions that confront evil.

2. Divert attention from the Holder hearings so gun owners and freedom lovers will not pay attention to the planned infringements that are being publicly announced during the hearings. They are not hiding their plans from us. However, they are using simple tricks to make us look the other direction. Everything we need to know about their plans is right in front of our faces. They are simply creating the psychological opportunity for us to ignore reality.

We must counter this by facing reality, accepting what has been exposed right before our eyes, and getting the issues to the forefront. Also, we must publicly expose their actions and their plans in the most loud and raucous way possible. This does not mean we should ignore HR45. In fact, the recent efforts by David and and gun rights activists at examiner.com were very impressive, and they should serve as a model for how to agitate against Obama's plans as announced by Holder. We must understand their tactics and keep them under steady pressure on all fronts.

Here are the recent efforts at examiner.com:
-"Qualifying Firearms"
-"Kill (the) Bill"

3. Condition the target (us) to eventually accept the more draconian plan in the future and test the target for compliance and submissiveness. By constantly barraging the target with threatened attacks and incremental infringements, the hope is that the target will eventually grow weary of threats to the peace and will decide that the constant threats of warfare are not worth the price. They also want to use numerous small attacks to make it seem like they have an impossibly large number of supporters. The enemy believes that if they keep this up long enough, one of their attacks will eventually reveal us as totally submissive and compliant to their plans. They also hope that we will feel overwhelmed and give up. The war will be over at that point, and they are gradually trying to move us in that direction.

We must counter this by refusing to submit in a loud and raucous manner at every opportunity. We must push back at every attack point because we will find that their forces are spread very thin and offer very little in the form of dedicated, deep resistance at any point. This is obvious whenever we take an aggressive stand against them - all opposition melts away, and we are left standing alone and victorious. The perfect examples are the recent battles over at examiner.com on HR45. In every case, the enemy threw in the towel in the presence of our onslaught and disappeared into the night. We must make it clear that we will never grow weary of the fight, and we must be prepared to back up our words with the relevant actions.

4. Provide plausible deniability for the Obama administration in that they did not publicly propose the more draconian HR45. Obama and his administration can point the finger at "extremists" outside of their administration who drafted HR45. Obama can then play the role of a great compromiser (and a moderate, to boot) by proposing a less extreme agenda than what is found in HR45. The "less extreme" agenda will actually be filled with extremist plans (e.g.; permanent assault weapon, end of private transfer of firearms, etc.), but these plans will seem tame compared to what is in HR45.

We must counter this by exposing the fraud of their behavior, and we must never let the Obama administration successfully play the moderate/compromiser card. We must "name names", and never let anyone off the hook for their actions.

Conclusion

The tactics of the enemy reveal that he is weak. If he were strong, he would launch a direct attack against us and crush us with a single blow. He is not strong enough to beat us with a single blow, nor does he have the broad public support that the media deceptively portrays. The other side of this coin is that we are strong. The only way the enemy can beat us is if we voluntarily submit to his simple tricks. His tricks have now been revealed to everyone. Now, we must use our knowledge and continue to fight back. The war is clearly on, and so are we.

7 comments:

  1. Keep your basic load at hand. Perform PMCS. Do PT regularly. Say your prayers. Be always vigilant.

    Longbow

    ReplyDelete
  2. ain't going along with licensing or the banning of "assault weapons". if they enact it, we need mass civil disobedience from gun owners. Possibly even self-defense action. As I watch the coronation of our next god-king, i see the loathsome sheep worship, i'm not putting my safety in their hands or the hands of their evil masters.

    ReplyDelete
  3. the same goes for the recently introduced H.J. 5.

    the same goes for eight years of bush before obama.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think H.R. 45 is a wish list, too--but that doesn't mean it can't be substantially revised and put to a vote.

    There are sects in the disarmament movement, much like the cliques in the pro-liberty movement. When Josh Sugarmann created the "assault weapon" tactic, he inadvertently created a new type of disarmer. This sect may have served his purpose initially, but it tends to attract the most hysterical, most ignorant, and most unreasonable disarmers. Pro-defense advocates have had many years to practice their responses to "assault weapon" hysteria.

    The AWB passed and expired, and no ATF trace data since has put the semi-auto rifle anywhere near the pistol. The trace data may not be statistically valid, but the huge spread between and rifles and pistols means something.

    Why is this good for us? Well, it's not, but it does buy us time. The most stupid political move at this point would be to go after the large segment of the American population that has just heavily invested in semi-auto rifles, and to interfere in a booming industry that stands out in an economic slump. Oh sure, they'll trot out the anti-gun dingbats with mascara running down their tear-soaked cheeks, but the mood of the country has been adjusted slightly toward cynical; people are going to care more about the amount they lost in their IRA, rather than what type of gun one gang member used to shoot another.

    No, I don't think it's going to be easy. Yeah, this time we're going to have to fight on all the fronts at once. It's just that an "assault weapons ban" is a tired, old tactic, and the Democrats will predictably screw up everything by attempting to employ it yet again.

    Also: Might not be a bad idea to explore the possibilities of recall legislation in your state.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the name of fighting terrorism, the British government has proposed a national database of all cell phone owners. The proposal would require people to present a passport or other government ID when they buy a phone.

    DON'T TELL RUSH/HOLDER/BHO/PELOSI.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If HR 45 goes away its provisions will be separately attached to so many unconnected bills divine intervention will be necessary to find all the hiding places, just like Total Information, remember, it was defunded...ha ha...

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.