Monday, February 16, 2009

An Order of Protection

Authorities say Aasiya Hassan recently had filed for divorce from her husband.

"She had an order of protection that had him out of the home as of Friday the 6th [of February]," Benz said. [More]
So she was beheaded.

Boy, that order worked about as well as hubby's "more positive light," didn't it...?

6 comments:

  1. Corned Cat has a link to a LawDog post called "Meditations On Paper Armor" that sums this up pretty well. "The LawDogFiles" don't appear to be available anymore, but Cornered Cat still has the post. A few years ago I was a juror on a case where the woman involved had a restraining order against a former boyfriend. He'd violated it several times, and each time she called the police, they told here they couldn't do anything unless they caught him in-the-act, or he harmed her. Just as criminals will always have guns while the law-abiding get disarmed, a restraining order assumes the person it's against will obey it.
    Yeah, right......

    ReplyDelete
  2. Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.

    Hmmm, beheading your wife for whatever reason - now THAT puts moslems at least in a true light..

    ReplyDelete
  3. I told my sister-in-law about this and she said she hadn't seen any mention of it on the news. I told her I hadn't either, and that I suspected it wouldn't appear on the national news. The reporting of which would do nothing to further their agenda.

    She had to search the internet to finally find the story. I didn't tell her where to look, because I wanted her to see just what games were being played. It took her several tries to find it.

    I love this woman like I love my own sister. But 20 years ago she thought and stated aloud many times that I was some wild-eyed radical conspiracy nut who just happened to be paranoid with delusions of persecution. Not so long ago, she said she finally realized that I was right and she had been living in the comfort of ignorance. She said, "almost everything you told me would happen, happened. And even I can see that the rest of what you have been saying is on the schedule."

    People are waking up, but in time? Who knows? I don't. I think time is running out. This woman is now 53 years old. Are we to wait 20 years for every convert to liberty, or must they all reach an age that is not tolerant of "pie in the sky" excuses and promises?

    We are awakening too slowly. I fear the results of our being the minority we are. Simply, because it is an encouragement to the enemies of liberty to invoke a "Final Solution".

    I do not expect that this one will be as easily accomplished as the last one. We will resist with as much force as we can. But wouldn't it be so much better if more Americans were aware, so that we could avoid the damn thing altogether?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, it would be much better, but when most of America gets its "news" from the lamestream media, who has it's own agenda, what are they to do? I keep trying to help people see what's going on by pointing them to alternative sources of information, but not all of them care to investigate things for themselves. I guess they just don't care until it hits them personally, and by then it could very well be too late...

    ReplyDelete
  5. "The LawDogFiles" don't appear to be available anymore,

    Don't do that! {calms racing pulse}

    http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2008/05/meditations-on-paper-armour.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. My mistake, and I apologize profusely. The link on the site I quoted from is apparently broken, and I didn't check into it deeply enough to realize that.
    I'll inform the nice lady at that site that the link is malformed or busted.
    Again, I apologize!
    Jim

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.