Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Was Key Evidence Left Out of DC Gun Case?

With these stakes, The Times' critique is serious, all the more so because Halbrook has earned such an august reputation, not just as a lawyer, but as one of the foremost scholars and champions of the right to keep and bear arms. There's nothing stated in the editorial he doesn't know inside and out. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column looks at an omission with potentially disastrous consequences.

Also link over to today's Trigger Sports LIVE!

Tell a friend?
at

1 comment:

  1. Longbow3/31/2010 1:20 PM

    Perhaps he thought it was self-evident?

    Or maybe because, as an "Esquire", he is an officer of the Court.

    Quien Nariz?

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.