That seems a pretty dangerous and irresponsible thing to do to people who want to be left alone. [More]This latest crap from this little dictator warranted a second Gun Rights Examiner column.
There's a solution of sorts in here, but I doubt anyone will try it.
Share the link?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDavid, you're closer to the industry than I am so I'm perfectly prepared to be proven wrong. But my gut says you're asking for virtue where there is none to be found.
ReplyDeleteThe only example I know of where this happened was Barrett, which you mentioned, but which as far as I know didn't have any substantial contracts with the state of California anyway. If you ask Remington, or Winchester, or S&W or Colt or - hell - any of them to make a choice between the "civilian" market or military/LEO, my gut says they'd walk away from the first without a backward glance. The bottom line is god, and the margins are just too delicious when you sell to governments.
Please. Tell me I'm wrong.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete