Monday, April 26, 2010

Shopping with Guns

Yeah, obviously this guy Nik is some kind of weakling who fears the average man. And girlfriend Kim is compensating for something...but what?

Or might there be another explanation besides the one the seething antis would offer us, since they both actually look like very cool and together people to me...

Watch the video and decide for yourself.

[Via David R]

9 comments:

  1. Crotalus (Don't Tread on Me)4/26/2010 10:09 AM

    Other than a few "how odd" comments, this one wasn't too bad. The reporter seemed to keep any bias he had in check.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Armed yet courteous" because everybody knows if you are armed you are some hyper aggressive impolite nutjob?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous said... "Nik is clearly just weeks away from a steroid-fueled rampage."

    Yeah, right, Anon. You, with your infinite powers, can tell by looking at him that he's on steroids and is ready to pop.

    You either have a problem with projection, dislike the guy because he's obviously spent time in the gym, or should be working for the Department of Pre-Crime.

    How's that for gross generalization?

    If he was 5'2" tall and weighed 115 pounds, I guess you'd say he's "compensating."

    Get a life. Jealous little wanker.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I take out the trash, Ned. We don't acknowlege shit here, we flush it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Crotalus (Don't Tread on Me)4/26/2010 1:26 PM

    Looks like this trash crawled out of the can and came back.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Crotalus (Don't Tread on Me)4/26/2010 1:49 PM

    But David strikes again! Take that, cretin! And thanks, David.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Feel like? Have to? NEED to? "Allow them" to roam around?

    You mean people are roaming around emoting with guns and the States allow it?

    Dear Lord, what shall we do?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Apologies for feeding the troll.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I read the original article at the Toronto Sun, and the comments. I found the following I thought worth repeating:

    Lee McGee commented on 2010-04-27: Please note: 1] Rights predate government. 2] The Right to defend one's life is axiomatic. 3] Without the means to defend one's life, the Right is negated. 4] Rights, akin to breathing, require neither permission nor acceptance to exist. 5] Rights are often most evident while being violated. 6] SCOTUS has consistently ruled the police are not responsible for the safety of the individual citizen. "Resistance to sudden violence, for the preservation not only of my person, my limbs, and life, but of my property, is an indisputable right of nature which I have never surrendered to the public by the compact of society, and which perhaps I could not surrender if I would." - John Adams, U.S President, British Traitor

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.