Monday, August 09, 2010

Politician calls campus gun defense advocate constituents 'extremists'

[N]ote their core arguments all center on why you can't be trusted. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column presents a pair of clucking ninnies who think they should be able to dictate how you and I choose to exercise our rights.

Also meet a not-so-great impostor.

Can I count on regular readers to help me share the link?

2 comments:

  1. They advocate the policy that worked so well at Virginia Tech -- for mass murderer Seung-hui Cho.
    A natural extension of their policy that we shuld line up to be indoctrinated, line up for higher tuitions, line up to die senselessly.
    Better a live extremist than a dead conformist. And since when is wanting to survive "extreme"?
    If you trust the professional Only Ones to sav you, you can find them standing in the snow, behind big thick trees, until they hear the shooting stop.
    However, if one of US is seen to have a WATER PISTOL, be assured that you'll be reported and taken down immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Concerning the Stolen Valor Act, a Federal Judge in Denver recently held that the law violates First Amendment rights - you have a Constitutional right to tell a big lie. See http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_15536854.

    Impersonating an officer or improper possession of the base vehicle pass would be a separate issue. What would happen if real MPs encountered the imposter incorrectly wearing a uniform?

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.