Tuesday, September 14, 2010

If Gun Owner Poses No Threat...

...he should never have been disarmed in the first damn place. [Read]

7 comments:

  1. Because the scumbag judge loves lording it over the peons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Someone SAID he said ... and that was enough to ruin a life.

    Those in authoritah hate having their oversights pointed out to them by mere civilians.

    ReplyDelete
  3. He'll never get the guns back. Asset forfeiture and all tat. Those guns are already "disappeared" out of the evidence locker and into the cops' private collections. Bet on it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Infamous Oregon Lawhobbit9/14/2010 3:32 PM

    "A world no guns in it would be ideal."

    Perhaps the editor who made that asinine remark should go spend thirty days in a high-security prision and experience, first hand, a world with no guns.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Or a really bad neighborhood where home invasion is the norm.

    Flight714

    ReplyDelete
  6. "A world with no guns in it would be ideal"

    Beat me to it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Forget it, it's Joisey...

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.