Sunday, September 12, 2010

Politicians' understanding of 2nd Amendment: Oblivious to on target

Every month, GUNS Magazine posts online its issues from half a century before, giving us a great window into a past some of us are old enough to remember... A free download of the September 1960 issue is now online. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column takes a brief trip to the past.

Bring some friends along?

2 comments:

  1. I'll be very glad to get my DSL service tomorrow so I can start to read these things. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Those who say certain rights were applicable to their time but no longer are, need to know that the conditions under which they were elected and sworn in may no longer apply, as well.
    Amazing, that congresscritters and mayors STILL bring up the Indian and wild animals threat argument. They've been mostly replaced by two-legged predators and tribes of sadistic thugs, but even if those did not exist, the right remains a right.
    Obama practically came out and agreed with the ground zero mosque imam that the First Amendment is a threat to national security and domestic peace. I remember a president quoting Voltaire: "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.