"The concern here is not with citizens exercising their legitimate constitutional right to keep and bear arms. The concern is with criminals abusing the right for dangerous and murderous ends." As if there weren't already myriad laws dealing with that. Elitist scum. We can have all the freedom THEY feel comfortable with us having. Define "legitimate," and "constitutional" and "right." Oh, they presume to. What they are saying is if there were no guns, there could be no illegal guns. And a lot of people have been conditioned to believe any gun you see is an "illegal gun." People will die because of this. Likewise, if there were no Internet, there would be no Internet child pornography, etc. It's a sacrifice the elites are willing to HAVE US MAKE. Burning down the house certainly does solve that termite problem. And if there were no newspapers, there would be no nasty libels against the innocent. They're plotting the course, but they don't think they'll be going on the cruise.
"The concern here is not with citizens exercising their legitimate constitutional right to keep and bear arms. The concern is with criminals abusing the right for dangerous and murderous ends."
ReplyDeleteAs if there weren't already myriad laws dealing with that.
Elitist scum. We can have all the freedom THEY feel comfortable with us having. Define "legitimate," and "constitutional" and "right."
Oh, they presume to.
What they are saying is if there were no guns, there could be no illegal guns. And a lot of people have been conditioned to believe any gun you see is an "illegal gun."
People will die because of this.
Likewise, if there were no Internet, there would be no Internet child pornography, etc. It's a sacrifice the elites are willing to HAVE US MAKE.
Burning down the house certainly does solve that termite problem.
And if there were no newspapers, there would be no nasty libels against the innocent.
They're plotting the course, but they don't think they'll be going on the cruise.