When will we demand with a loud and clear voice, at least at the level we had for the concealed carry in National Parks, to remove the sporting purpose from the '68n GCA?
Telescoping stocks are a good thing because they allow a shotgun (or any other rifle for that matter) to fit the different people in a household for more accurate aiming. The part about, "sporting" for firearms being part of the law in which to regulate firearms is pure hogwash. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with "sporting" and the proof of that is, the Kentucky Rifle. The Kentucky Rifle was an assault rifle in its day and was a huge part of winning the war against the English. The founders never dreamed of putting the Second Amendment together to protect the "sporting" side of firearms. The truth of this is, the shotgun advancements in performance is power in the hands of citizens, which is what the Second Amendment was all about. Why am I telling you folks this is related to morning coffee in excessive amounts.
I think I just threw up a little in my mouth.
ReplyDeleteI notice the idiots misspelled "importability" in the url. Their incompetence rivals the fictional "Wonker Weiners" (Far Side cartoon).
ReplyDeleteThe NASDAP sporting purpose surfaces once again.
ReplyDeleteWhen will we demand with a loud and clear voice, at least at the level we had for the concealed carry in National Parks, to remove the sporting purpose from the '68n GCA?
This is far more important.
That "infringement" reads like "denial of civil right under color of law".
ReplyDeleteAnyone at ATF take an oath to "protect and defend against domestic enemies"? ATF should be arresting itself.
"Sporting purpose" bites us in the ass again. Plinking -- assassinating tin cans -- "is not a sport."
ReplyDeleteSome people say shooting paper targets isn't a sport either, but murderer training.
Let them have their word-weasel fun while they can. Over soon.
Telescoping stocks are a good thing because they allow a shotgun (or any other rifle for that matter) to fit the different people in a household for more accurate aiming.
ReplyDeleteThe part about, "sporting" for firearms being part of the law in which to regulate firearms is pure hogwash. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with "sporting" and the proof of that is, the Kentucky Rifle. The Kentucky Rifle was an assault rifle in its day and was a huge part of winning the war against the English. The founders never dreamed of putting the Second Amendment together to protect the "sporting" side of firearms.
The truth of this is, the shotgun advancements in performance is power in the hands of citizens, which is what the Second Amendment was all about.
Why am I telling you folks this is related to morning coffee in excessive amounts.
I note a Saiga .410 pictured in the report as well as what appears to be a MD-20 magazine for the Saiga-12.
ReplyDeleteReading through the mind-numbing twaddle in the PDF (this is sporting enough, that is not sporting enough, too bulky, measure this way) is angering.
Not to even start with SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Morons.
(Swinging by the mdarms.com site and the agparms.com sites show both manufacturers to be out of stock of magazines. Heh.)