Friday, January 21, 2011

Canada home firebombing case shows evil of anti-defense laws

If anything, Mr. Thomson showed great restraint—anyone throwing Molotov cocktails at an occupied house deserves to be repelled using any and all force necessary, including lethal. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column  returns fire at the arson enablers.

Also put a little something extra in the collection plate this Sunday.

Share the link?

1 comment:

  1. From the land of Patrick Henry and Edgar Allan Poe, greetings.
    Every day I wake up and log on to see what fresh hell presents itself to the minds of reasonable men.
    The authorities' response to Mr. Thomson's restraint -- that repelling terrorist thug attempted-murdering arsonists NONlethally -- will be punished to the full extent of the law -- forces us down a narrowing cone of choices.
    Let them kill you and yours and be eulogized as a good, nonviolent second-class citi-- er, subject.
    Set YOURSELF on fire in protest and then shoot YOURSLF. The stupid, it burns.
    Lay waste your would-be murderers and gear up with your main battle rifle for the next wave.
    Liberty? Nevermore.
    Liberty, THEN Death.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.