You would think that conservative Republicans, who are known to emphasize law enforcement, would be providing the ATF and other law enforcement with the maximum number of tools to control and track these guns. These include closing loopholes in laws that facilitate following guns across the border... I *think* he meant allowing, but I would expect such a high profile lawyer to say what he actually means, so does that mean he wants to make it harder to track weapons? Or does he want to increase border security making it harder to physically follow weapons?
By the way, I'm all for making it harder to track private property and making it harder to cross our international borders illegally (cause the drugs and weapons that cross the borders do not typically do so through the 'normal' crossing points, and as an added bonus the illegal immigrant problem would slow down a little)
You would think that conservative Republicans, who are known to emphasize law enforcement, would be providing the ATF and other law enforcement with the maximum number of tools to control and track these guns. These include closing loopholes in laws that facilitate following guns across the border...
ReplyDeleteI *think* he meant allowing, but I would expect such a high profile lawyer to say what he actually means, so does that mean he wants to make it harder to track weapons? Or does he want to increase border security making it harder to physically follow weapons?
By the way, I'm all for making it harder to track private property and making it harder to cross our international borders illegally (cause the drugs and weapons that cross the borders do not typically do so through the 'normal' crossing points, and as an added bonus the illegal immigrant problem would slow down a little)
According to Lanny Davis, its all our fault that the ATF had to give guns to the cartels.
ReplyDeleteWhat a load of lying BS. Of course, Lanny had a lot of practice lying for Democrats during the Clinton admin.