If Menino, a partner in New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors
Against Illegal Guns, can block a business based on political issues
they support, what is to stop him from doing so based on a company’s
championing of the Second Amendment, or a host of other issues that defy
the so-called “progressive” agenda of government control and dominance
over every aspect of citizens’ lives? Can business interest that support
right to life or voter ID, or other “conservative causes” be far
behind? Is it the place of government that is supposed to represent all
of the people to discriminate against disapproved minorities and bestow a
competitive advantage, not to mention special privileges and
immunities, only to concerns that promote the agenda of the political
bosses? [More]
Today's
Gun Rights Examiner offering notes it's unseemly and offensive for
Mumbles to be choking the chicken in public.
And I'm sure the folks of Boston believe all that claptrap. The "open" and "inclusive" stuff doesn't apply to those who only want to be left alone to live their lives and defend themselves as they see fit... of course.
ReplyDeleteAmericn freedom, born in Boston. Now dead there.
ReplyDeleteI would just once again note that is "Law Enforcement" who, IN SPITE OF their oath to the Constitution, enable this.
ReplyDeleteYes, there MAY be some few honorable "Law Enforcement" officers in this country. If there are, they are only in the smallest of "Law Enforcement" organizations. And merely being a small "Law Enforcement" organization does NOT guarantee its members are honorable. "Law Enforcement" in this country makes lawyers look honorable in comparison!
The stench is overwhelming. And it smells like pig.