If the Second Amendment protects the right of [redacted] to equip himself for mass murder, it’s time to repeal the Second Amendment. [More]What did I just get done saying about the "slippery slope"? Maybe the antis are right and it is a myth--looks to me like they're going straight for the precipice.
Somehow, I don't think Jerome here is going to help with the rounding up.
Things are getting interesting, people, and dangerous. I've never seen the Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists in such a state of mouth-foaming revival tent fervor.
[Via SamAdams1776]
How convenient this happened right before the decision point on the UN treaty.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I noticed that, too. Helps divert attention from Fast and Furious as well. Mighty convenient. Maybe a little too convenient.
ReplyDelete"Things are getting interesting, people, and dangerous. I've never seen the Fourth Estate Fifth columnists in such a state of mouth-foaming revival tent fervor."
ReplyDeleteIt sure does look like a coordinated finish-line sprint, doesn't it?
We should remember this, too: when this machine ramps up like this, the "October surprises" sometimes come in multiples.
Eyes. Ears.
They'll say that they oppose our right to equip ourselves for mass murder, but how come they oppose our right to equip ourselves to resist mass murder too? They just want to take our guns is why. They want us completely defenseless, so that they can impose their political agenda on us with no meaningful resistance. People who have a gun can say “no” to their agenda and mean it. They don’t like that. It’s about mass murder all right - the mass murder they mean to impose on us via their government.
ReplyDeleteAh, but Chas, "Law Enforcement" would NEVER allow that to happen. After all, they ARE sworn to the Constitution. And their oath of office means SO MUCH to them...
ReplyDeleteThe only good pig...