That this particular panel would arrive at the conclusion they did
should hardly surprise anyone who understands who they are and that
expecting fair and unbiased judicial review from establishment-approved
jurists with an agenda is a myth perpetuated to give such courts the
appearance of authoritative legitimacy. In fact, all three of these
characters have pasts and documented sympathies that would have made any
other ruling improbable, to put it kindly. [More]
Today's
Gun Rights Examiner report looks at a serious bit of judicial activist subversion--a huge legal setback for the Second Amendment that could pave the way for more if you and I allow it.
Any restriction that stops just short of an outright ban on possession will be deemed ok. This is the legacy of Heller and McDonald.
ReplyDelete