It is curious that the reporter can detail the weapons and ammunition in the house, but gives no details on the defects in the house that led to the condemnation. As a vacant lot, there would be minimal tax revenue generated compared to a lot improved by a home. The local government may want to remove vacant homes, but that alone is usually insufficient grounds to condemn a property. It appears in this case that the condemnation process is forcing the vacancy, which is circular logic.
Perhaps some Greenpeace-like activists can be recruited to jump in front of the bulldozer?
It is curious that the reporter can detail the weapons and ammunition in the house, but gives no details on the defects in the house that led to the condemnation. As a vacant lot, there would be minimal tax revenue generated compared to a lot improved by a home. The local government may want to remove vacant homes, but that alone is usually insufficient grounds to condemn a property. It appears in this case that the condemnation process is forcing the vacancy, which is circular logic.
ReplyDeletePerhaps some Greenpeace-like activists can be recruited to jump in front of the bulldozer?