Skelton seems to ooze pure evil. The question of whether or not someone should be "allowed" to own a gun implies that they can be disallowed, and thus not have one. It's a long way between disallowing someone, and them not having a gun. I doubt that any of the people who committed the over 500 murders in Chicago were "allowed" to have a gun. So what good does rubberstamping someone as allowed or disallowed actually do? It's a crackpot idea.
Then we can start on this "free" exercise of political speech and religious expression thing, as lots of resources are being wasted and we are annoyed by the noise they make singing, chanting and otherwise carrying on.
We should thank them for pointing out that the cops are "trained killers" which reenforces the reason for the 2nd Amendment.
ReplyDeleteSkelton seems to ooze pure evil.
ReplyDeleteThe question of whether or not someone should be "allowed" to own a gun implies that they can be disallowed, and thus not have one. It's a long way between disallowing someone, and them not having a gun. I doubt that any of the people who committed the over 500 murders in Chicago were "allowed" to have a gun. So what good does rubberstamping someone as allowed or disallowed actually do? It's a crackpot idea.
Then we can start on this "free" exercise of political speech and religious expression thing, as lots of resources are being wasted and we are annoyed by the noise they make singing, chanting and otherwise carrying on.
ReplyDelete